This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (58)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

One Ethical Approach to the Uninformed Cancer Patient

Benjamin Freedman, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 1993;153(5):572-576.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

MEDICAL AND social attitudes toward cancer have evolved rapidly during the last 20 years, particularly in North America.^1,2 Most physicians, most of the time, in most hospitals, accept the ethical proposition that patients are entitled to know their diagnosis. However, there remains in my experience a significant minority of cases in which patients are never informed that they have cancer or, although informed of the diagnosis, are not informed when disease progresses toward a terminal phase. Although concealment of diagnosis can certainly occur in cases of other terminal or even nonterminal serious illnesses, it seems to occur more frequently and in more exacerbated form with cancer because of the traditional and cultural resonances of dread associated with cancer.

These cases challenge our understanding of and commitment to an ethical physician-patient relationship. In addition, they are observably a significant source of tension between healthcare providers. When the responsible physician persists . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Clinical Ethicist Jewish General Hospital Montreal, Quebec

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?