This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

J. David Daniels, MD
Huntington, WVa

Arch Intern Med. 1994;154(11):1291.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The recently published article¹ and the accompanying editorial² in the ARCHIVES would seem to advocate the position of universal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for all dying patients. The authors would suggest that the only way to know whether or not cardiopulmonary resuscitation may be effective is a trial of full resuscitation efforts. The American Heart Association has issued a statement that cardiopulmonary resuscitation is to be used in cases of unexpected and sudden cessation of vital signs. Use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients with organ failure, metastatic cancer, and advanced acquired immunodeficiency syndrome may not be in the best interests of patients in the final stages of their lives.

Acceptance of an impending death has been a major failure of the American medical establishment over the last 30 years. Death has always been regarded as the dreaded enemy with an air of failure, guilt, and suspicion. Death may be better . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?