You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 154 No. 7, 11 April 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editor's Correspondence
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Invasive or Allergic Fungal Sinusitis?-Reply

Yahya Ismail, MD; Edward L. Arsura, MD
Bakersfield, Calif

Arch Intern Med. 1994;154(7):815-819.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In response to Busch's letter, we believe that our patient's initial presentation was allergic fungal sinusitis.1 However, invasive fungal sinusitis supravened, as evidenced by the multiple recurrences and the extent of soft-tissue invasion and the bony destruction that is shown in Figure 1 in our article. In addition, the aforementioned features are in accordance with the definition of invasive sinusitis, as described in the literature.2-4 Furthermore, there have been numerous cases in the literature of invasive sinusitis characterized by tissue invasion resulting in bony destruction with extension into the orbit and/or intracranially, which occur in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised hosts.4

There is considerable support in the literature for the use of antifungal therapy, specifically amphotericin B, in both recurrent and invasive fungal sinusitis.5 Different treatment modalities have been tried alone or in conjunction with surgical resection, but there is not enough evidence that they are effective; . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.