You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 155 No. 13, 10 JULY 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editor's Correspondence
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Has the Cost-effectiveness of Misoprostol Been Underestimated?-Reply

Gerold Stucki, MD, MS
Zurich, Switzerland

Magnus Johannesson, PhD
Stockholm, Sweden

Matthew H. Liang, MD, MPH
Boston, Mass

Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(13):1451-1452.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In reply

We appreciate the comments of Fort and Hoffmann and Gabriel. Fort and Hoffmann state that misoprostol is indicated for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) users with risk factors such as advanced age, history of peptic ulcer disease, and comorbid conditions, but its promotion and perceived indications are not as conservative. For instance, in the current issue of Drug Information for Physicians in Switzerland,1 no mention of these risk factors is made.

The combination of misoprostol and a NSAID in fixed doses may increase compliance, but there are disadvantages as well. In patients with rheumatic diseases, the clinically effective dose and the time of administration for NSAIDs vary. With the use of fixed combinations, the effective and minimally necessary dose cannot be adjusted with the same caution as with single drugs. Our review was not about the rational use of misoprostol; it was about the evidence with regard to . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.