You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 155 No. 20, 13 NOVEMBER 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editor's Correspondence
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Nonulcer Dyspepsia and Helicobacter pylori: Causal or Coincidental?

R. J. L. F. Loffeld, MD, PhD; B. F. M. Werdmuller, MD
Zaandam, the Netherlands

Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(20):2253-2254.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

We read with great interest the article by Schlemper et al1 that appeared in the January 9, 1995, issue of the ARCHIVES. The authors studied the prevalence of IgG Helicobacter pyloriantibodies and dyspeptic symptoms in a selected group of the Dutch working population and conclude that nonulcer dyspepsia (NUD) is not related to H pylori infection.

After reading the introduction, it is obvious that Schlemper and colleagues do not believe that H pylori plays a role in NUD. The only purpose of their study seems to be the validation of this assumption. Their article presents an epidemiologic study; therefore, conclusions regarding individuals are not warranted. In our opinion, there are several flaws that make the final conclusion doubtful.

The authors state: "Only a few studies investigated unselected individuals, as we have done. Most investigators studied patients referred for endoscopy." This is an important point. Case notes were verified . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.