This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Gary R. Cutter, PhD
Denver, Colo

Donald O. Mutti, OD, PhD; Karla Zadnik, OD, PhD
Berkeley, Calif

Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(4):427-429.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In the August 22,1994, issue of the ARCHIVES, Wang et al¹ reported on risk factors associated with patients' awareness of their own eye disease, such as cataract, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, and age-related macular degeneration. Among other factors such as age, general health, history of diabetes, and having insurance for eye care, the authors identified a 7.25-fold increase in the risk of unawareness of eye disease on the part of the patient if the previous eye care practitioner was an optometrist. It is unfortunate that the authors could not resist the pejorative comment, "the prevalence of eye disease in optometrists' offices and the effectiveness of the tests conducted by optometrists to identify eye disease requires further investigation."¹ Such over-extension of the results from this study is a cause for continuing divisiveness between two professions and serves no patients well.

The fact that this conclusion is not in any way . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?