This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Russell D. Hull, MBBS, MSc; William Feldstein, MBA; Paul D. Stein, MD; Graham F. Pineo, MD; Gary E. Raskob, MSc
Calgary, Alberta

Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(15):1760-1762.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Merrill's statement that "the effectiveness of this approach [serial leg testing], however, is not so clearly defined" is incorrect. Our prospective cohort study¹ evaluated the effectiveness of serial noninvasive leg testing, and the safety of withholding anticoagulant therapy if the results of this testing were negative, even though pulmonary embolism may have remained undetected. The effectiveness of serial noninvasive leg testing was evaluated by measuring clinical outcome on long-term follow-up, and our study clearly did so. Furthermore, Merrill's statement that "not treating these patients [with pulmonary embolism] is likely to result in a poor outcome" is an opinion that is not supported by the outcome data from our prospective study. The cohort with negative results on serial leg testing had a low rate of venous thromboembolism on follow-up: pulmonary embolism, 0.6% (4 of 627 patients); deep vein thrombosis, 1.3% (8 of 627 patients).1 This outcome is similar to that . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?