You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 156 No. 2, 22 JANUARY 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editor's Correspondence
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Cholesterol Lowering and the Risk of Stroke

Bradley S. Boop, MD
Little Rock, Ark

Robert G. Hart, MD; David G. Sherman, MD
San Antonio, Tex

Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(2):214-215.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

We welcomed the review of stroke in trials of cholesterol lowering by Hebert et al1 and agree both with their caution on interpreting these data and with their call for further clinical trials. Although the authors concluded that there was no benefit of cholesterol lowering for reduction of stroke, two recent studies offer contradictory evidence (Table). The Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study included patients with angina or previous myocardial infarction and total serum cholesterol concentrations of 5.5 to 8.0 mmol/L (212 to 308 mg/dL).2 Patients were randomized to a hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase

Formula inhibitor or placebo and were followed up for more than 5 years. A 25% reduction in total cholesterol and a 35% reduction in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in the treated group was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality, coronary events, and ischemic stroke. Ischemic strokes categorized as "nonembolic" (not defined) were reduced by about . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.