You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 27 No. 4, APRIL 1921 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

VARIATIONS OF ACID CONCENTRATION IN DIFFERENT PORTIONS OF THE GASTRIC CHYME, AND ITS RELATION TO CLINICAL METHODS OF GASTRIC ANALYSIS

FRANK D. GORHAM, M.D.

Arch Intern Med. 1921;27(4):434-440.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The quantitative determination of the variation of gastric acidity during different phases of digestion by the so-called "fractional method of gastric analysis" is presumably based on the assumption that the gastric chyme, after a test meal, is a homogeneous mixture, and that a small portion (from 6 to 10 c.c.), aspirated at fifteen minute intervals, represents the acid concentration of the gastric contents as a whole at that period of digestion. If this above hypothesis is correct, and if it is based on a true physiologic principle, then we should expect the acid concentration of different portions of the remaining gastric chyme to be similar at these different intervals after a test meal. It is my purpose to show that this hypothesis is not based on true physiology, and that the acidity of one portion, as obtained by the fractional method, may differ widely from the acidity of different portions . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

ST. LOUIS

From the Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1921 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.