You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 27 No. 4, APRIL 1921 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  BOOK REVIEW
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

PRINCIPLES OF HUMAN PHYSIOLOGY.

By Ernest H. Starling, C.M.G., F.R.S., etc., Jodrell Professor of Physiology in University College, London. The chapter on the sense organs revised and largely rewritten by H. Hartridge, M.A., M.B., Cantab. Ed. 3, with 579 illustrations, 10 in color. Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger, 1920.

Arch Intern Med. 1921;27(4):515-516.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The success of Starling's Physiology, as shown by reaching a third edition in eight years, is to be explained by the author's high standing as experimenter and teacher, by the clearness of the statement and well chosen arrangement of the work, and these warrant its use by beginners. There is one curious feature, over 100 pages, or almost one-eleventh of the total space, is devoted to vision. Perhaps, the vagaries of the medical book trade are to blame for this; perhaps, lack of time to condense the material into space proportionate to that of other topics. In strong contrast to this large chapter, the ear and its associated organs are discussed in a few pages. Perhaps, Bárány's work was made too prominent by certain specialists during the war, but that seems all the greater reason why a clear and authoritative summary should be given.

Readers of the ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1921 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.