You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 41 No. 1, JANUARY 1928 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

THE IODINE-STARCH TEST OF BODY FLUIDS

DEDUCTIONS FROM OVER ONE HUNDRED CONSECUTIVE TESTS OF THE EXTERNAL SECRETION OF THE PANCREAS IN DIABETES, IN DISEASES OF THE GALLBLADDER AND PANCREAS, AND IN A NORMAL CONDITION

ANTHONY BASSLER, M.D.

Arch Intern Med. 1928;41(1):18-41.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Considerable interest has been awakened concerning a test for pancreatic activity which has been advanced recently.1 Communications from different sources show its adoption as a clinical procedure for judging the condition of the pancreas by estimating the amyloclastic power of its external secretion. Doubts have arisen and the number of researches and experiences have multiplied until it seems warranted to present further data on the test.

The factors of the combining power of iodine solutions of peptone and other organic substances were known to me before the presentation of the test. So far as a solution of peptone admixture was concerned, my co-workers and I guarded against this shortly after the test was advanced, which was several months before the time of publication of the article by a procedure which I shall mention. Because the other factors could not be controlled (they were judged as insignificant), the modification of Piersol, . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

NEW YORK


Footnotes

Read before the Section on Gastro-Enterology and Proctology at the Seventy-Eighth Annual Session of the American Medical Association, Washington, D. C., May 20, 1927.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1928 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.