This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

WESLEY E. GATEWOOD, M.D.; OLIVER H. GAEBLER, Ph.D.; EDWARD MUNTWYLER, Ph.D.; VICTOR C. MYERS, Ph.D.

Arch Intern Med. 1928;42(1):79-105.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Although toxic symptoms in certain patients being treated for peptic ulcer were observed by Sippy and his co-workers and some study of the blood chemistry had been carried out in a considerable number of these patients, the results were apparently not considered of sufficient importance to warrant their publication. The first observations concerning the intoxication produced by the administration of large amounts of alkali in the Sippy treatment to be recorded in detail were those of Hardt and Rivers¹ in 1923. They pointed out that "patients with duodenal ulcer treated by the Sippy method may develop definite symptoms of toxemia associated with renal changes, increased blood urea, and normal or increased carbon dioxide combining power of the plasm"; they asserted also that "patients with duodenal ulcer and renal complications are more inclined to develop these toxic manifestations and to a much greater degree" Shortly after the report of Hardt and . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
PORTLAND, ORE.; NEW YORK; CLEVELAND

From the Departments of Internal Medicine and Biochemistry, The State University of Iowa, Iowa City.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?