You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 42 No. 2, AUGUST 1928 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

PANCREATIC FUNCTION

I. THE QUANTITATIVE ESTIMATION OF PANCREATIC SECRETION

SEIZABURO OKADA, M.D.; EIICHI SAKURAI, M.D.; TSUNAMOTO IMAZU, M.D.; KWANICHI KURAMOCHI, M.D.

Arch Intern Med. 1928;42(2):270-281.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The value of the quantitative estimation of pancreatic function is apparent. Interest in pancreatic function really goes back to the time when Einhorn introduced the duodenal tube.1 Previous to that time, pancreatic functional tests depended on examinations of the feces, which were inaccurate. In these examinations, when many striated muscle fibers, steatorrhea and fatty acid crystals are found, there is generally pronounced dysfunction of the pancreas. Other conditions than pancreatic disease may give positive observations, and often, in distinct pancreatic involvement, the feces tests yield normal reactions, owing to the fact that the enzyme activity of intestinal bacteria has supplanted deficient pancreatic secretion. The Schmidt test,2 Kashiwado's modification3 and Einhorn's bead test4 show also only extreme dysfunction of the pancreas in cases in which the observations are positive. The tests of enzymatic activity in feces as suggested by Gross5 are also more or less inaccurate, probably more often inaccurate than . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

TOKYO, JAPAN

From the medical clinic of Prof. R. Inada, Imperial University of Tokyo.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1928 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.