This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

N. S. FERRY, M.D.; ARLYLE NOBLE, A.B.

Arch Intern Med. 1929;43(2):274-294.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

During the past few years several papers have appeared with definite detailed descriptions of green-producing micrococci, obtained from measles, which were considered more or less closely associated with the etiology of the disease. From these original descriptions, it is apparent that the organisms differ from one another in many respects, although the impression has been given and the statement made by several writers that they are similar.

The present study was undertaken in an attempt to arrive at some definite conclusion, if possible, in regard to the relationship of these organisms to one another, and to determine, if they differ, wherein their fundamental differences lie, for the ultimate purpose of determining their relationship to measles.

The first mention of a green-producing micrococcus found frequently associated with measles was in 1917, by Tunnicliff.₁ This organism was described by the author as a green-producing diplococcus that was isolated from the blood, throat . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
DETROIT

From the Medical Research Laboratories, Parke, Davis and Company.

Footnotes
Submitted for publication, Aug. 16, 1928.

Read before the American Association of Immunologists, Washington, D. C., May 1, 1928.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?