You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 50 No. 4, OCTOBER 1932 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Book Reviews
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Guide to Radiologic Diagnosis in Heart Disease.

By Geza Nemet, M.D., with the aid of the Committee on Research of the Heart Committee. Paper. Price, 35 cents. Pp. 33, with 31 illustrations. New York: New York Tuberculosis and Health Association, 1931.

Arch Intern Med. 1932;50(4):647-648.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

These two pamphlets constitute a plea for standardization in cardiac diagnosis. The first pamphlet describes the technic of radiologic examination, what may be learned from radiologic examination and, equally important, what may not be determined. It is of equal value to the radiologist and the clinician. Many diagrams depicting the changes that accompany various disorders of the heart add greatly to the value of the work.

The second pamphlet should be entitled "Criteria for the Description of Electrocardiograms." Correctly enough, it does not consider interpretation in the sense that the fundamental cause of the electrocardiogram is discussed. Fifty key numbers are given which may be used to describe the various types of electrocardiographic curves. These cover all of the usual, and many of the unusual, graphs. Illustrative electrocardiograms are included.

The authors express the hope that both volumes may lead to more uniformity in the terms of cardiac diagnosis. Some . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1932 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.