You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 53 No. 5, MAY 1934 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

NATURE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF HEART SOUNDS AND OF APEX IMPULSES IN BUNDLE BRANCH BLOCK

J. K. LEWIS, M.D.

Arch Intern Med. 1934;53(5):741-761.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

King1 and King and McEachern2 described a group of physical signs by means of which they were able to recognize bundle branch block in 85 per cent of patients with this condition. These signs consist of a visible or palpable double apical impulse, reduplication of the first sound at the apex, an asynchronous first sound and murmur and asynchronous systolic murmurs. The abnormal impulse was found in over 80 per cent of their patients and was regarded as the most important sign. A reduplicated first sound was present in 56 per cent of their patients, and the other signs mentioned occurred less frequently. In a number of patients they obtained graphic evidence of the presence of a double systolic apical impulse by photographing the movements of a straw or its shadow attached to the chest wall at the site where the abnormal impulse was seen or felt.

No . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

SAN FRANCISCO

From the Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1934 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.