You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 55 No. 1, JANUARY 1935 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PHENOLSULPHONPHTHALEIN TEST OF RENAL FUNCTION

EATON M. MacKAY, M.D.; DAVID A. RYTAND, M.D.

Arch Intern Med. 1935;55(1):131-140.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The aim of any test of biologic function is to determine the existing function of an organ or tissue in relation to the function if the tissue or organ and organism as a whole were normal. A quantitative consideration is necessary for the proper evaluation of any function. In the case of the kidney, an attempt to measure the amount of functioning renal tissue must be the aim of any test of function. The test with phenolsulphonphthalein (phenol red) is probably the most widely used, at least in this country, of the numerous tests of renal function which have been proposed, and it is the purpose of the present study to inquire to what degree it meets the criteria. When the test was first described by Rowntree and Geraghty,1 it was found experimentally that the removal of half the normal renal tissue was without influence on the results of . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

LA JOLLA, CALIF.; SAN FRANCISCO

From the Scripps Metabolic Clinic, La Jolla, Calif., and the Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, San Francisco.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1935 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.