You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 57 No. 1, JANUARY 1936 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Book Reviews
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Carotid Sinus and the Cerebral Circulation.

By Erik Ask-Upmark. Acta psychiatrica et neurologica, Supplement VI. Pp. 374, Lund, 1935.

Arch Intern Med. 1936;57(1):236-237.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Ask-Upmark has approached the problem of the relationship between the carotid sinus and the cerebral circulation from three angles: anatomic, experimental and clinical. Following an extensive general introduction, he describes the dissection of the carotid sinus in twenty-seven species of mammals, reptiles, amphibia and birds. The sinus is located at the origin of the internal carotid artery or its homologs. In the absence of the internal carotid artery the site is the base of the occipital artery. The sinus is innervated chiefly by the glossopharyngeal, partially by the vagus and the sympathetic, and rarely by the hypoglossal, nerves. The glossopharyngeal nerve is especially important, judging from the morphologic and physiologic evidence presented. Embryologically, this is to be expected, since the sinus is probably derived from the arterial structures of the third branchial arch, which lies in the domain of the ninth nerve. It is regrettable that microscopic studies were not . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1936 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.