This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal

A REVIEW OF THE RECENT LITERATURE

PAUL PADGET, M.D.; MAURICE SULLIVAN, M.D.; JOSEPH EARLE MOORE, M.D.

Arch Intern Med. 1938;62(6):1029-1090.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The material for this review was selected from publications which appeared during the last half of 1937 and the first half of 1938. As in previous reviews,¹ it has been necessary to exercise a rigid selection of material and largely to exclude the literature on experimental syphilis and on serologic studies.

HISTORY OF SYPHILIS

The effect of social custom and "mass morality" on the usage of words by authors is. well illustrated in Sir d'Arcy Power's² discussion of the use of the word pox in English literature. Shakespeare used it nineteen times, but later, during the Victorian era and for many years thereafter, it was taboo. There is no mention of venereal disease in the works of Thackeray or of Dickens.

In an interesting article, the title of which contains the type of pun that would have amused Shakespeare, Stillians³ recounts the controversy between Ricord and Auzias-Turenne . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
BALTIMORE

From the Syphilis Division of the Medical Clinic of the Johns Hopkins University and Hospital.