You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 62 No. 6, DECEMBER 1938 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Book Reviews
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Die Zuverlässigkeit der Röntgendiagnostik, besonders Hinsichtlich des Wertes der Urographie, und die Prognose bei Nieren und Harnleitersteinen. Acta radiologica, supplement 32.

By Helge B. Wulff. Price, 15 kronor. Pp. 301, with 36 illustrations. Stockholm: Håkan Ohlssons Boktryckeri, 1936.

Arch Intern Med. 1938;62(6):1095.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

This study consists of an elaborate analysis of over 1,000 cases of renal and ureteral stones, representing all the cases of this type noted in the Lund Clinic since 1923. It is therefore of particular interest to the urologist. The first important problem is the evaluation of the reliability of roentgenographic diagnosis. The introduction of the use of opaque mediums is shown to have improved the results materially. Examination in the presence of pain as compared with examination during the period in which there is no pain also shows interesting differences. The second main aspect of the study deals with prognosis and with conservative and operative methods. Definite differences, for example, as regards recurrences, are brought out.

The work is thoroughly done. The large group of cases adds considerable weight to the conclusions, which in a statistical study lean heavily on numbers. However, the space occupied appears to be considerably . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1938 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.