You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 63 No. 5, MAY 1939 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

STUDIES OF UROBILINOGEN

III. CLINICAL VALUE OF DETERMINATIONS OF UROBILINOGEN CONTENT OF SINGLE SPECIMENS OF URINE AND STOOL

ROBERT SPARKMAN, M.D.

Arch Intern Med. 1939;63(5):872-883.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Three distinct types of clinical information can be derived from studies of fecal and urinary urobilinogen.

Estimations of the urobilinogen of the stool constitute the best single measure of the rate of destruction of red cells. Increase of urobilinogen in the urine is one of the first manifestations of hepatic disease. Combined estimations of the urobilinogen of the stool and of the urine furnish one of the few dependable means of distinguishing between jaundice of intrahepatic origin and jaundice arising from obstruction of the extrahepatic biliary passages.

In spite of their potential value, studies of fecal and urinary urobilinogen have not come into general clinical use. This is readily understood when one realizes that most methods for the determination of urobilinogen require several days for the collection of specimens and several hours for the analytic procedures themselves.

In the first article of this series there was described a simple and . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

CINCINNATI

From the Laboratories of Baylor University Hospital, Department of Pathology, Baylor University College of Medicine, Dallas, Texas.


Footnotes

This work was aided by a grant from the Fraser Fund.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1939 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.