This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

J. M. HAYMAN, Jr., M.D.; J. W. MARTIN, Jr., M.D.; MAX MILLER, M.D.

Arch Intern Med. 1939;64(1):69-83.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The majority of tests of renal function are interpreted and their results recorded in terms of the values obtained for normal persons. Any one of them yields an estimate of the efficiency of the kidneys at a particular time, but this may be of little prognostic significance, for it is well known that in acute nephritis, acute infections, ureteral obstruction or cardiac failure renal function may be severely depressed and yet with recovery of the patient may return to normal. In chronic renal disease, however, decreasing functional values usually indicate the relentless progress of the condition.

The ideal test of function would give not only an estimate of the degree of loss of renal efficiency but information as to the manner in which the normal physiologic processes have been disturbed. The processes involved in the formation of urine are so complex that no test has been devised by which it . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
CLEVELAND

From the Department of Medicine, Western Reserve University, and the Medical Service of Lakeside Hospital.

Footnotes
The expense of this study was defrayed in part by a grant from the Commonwealth Fund.

A preliminary report of some of these observations was presented at the Fifty-Second Session of the Association of American Physicians, May 5, 1937 (Tr. A. Am. Physicians 52:182, 1937).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?