You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 66 No. 2, AUGUST 1940 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Book Reviews
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Treatment of Rheumatism in General Practice.

By W. S. C. Copeman. M.D., Physician in Charge of the Department of Chronic Rheumatic Diseases. West London Hospital. Price $4. Third edition. Pp. viii + 276. Baltimore: The Williams and Wilkins Company, 1939.

Arch Intern Med. 1940;66(2):528.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Just as it always is pleasant to meet an attractive person, so it is equally pleasant to be introduced to an attractive book. "The Treatment of Rheumatism in General Practice" falls in this category.

The first edition was published in 1933. It was two hundred and fifteen pages long, it sold for S3.25 in this country and it was highly spoken of by the critical minded. Our colleague, The Journal of the American Medical Association (102: 397-398 [Feb. 3] 1934), gave it a very favorable review. It was pointed out that there were a few,minor faults in the book, particularly omission of any bibliographic references to the eighty authors mentioned, lack of discussion of gout, the disease so regularly mistaken by American physicians for rheumatic fever or chronic arthritis, and little description of the methods available for desensitization and immunization in arthritis. But, on the whole, The Journal liked the . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1940 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.