This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

DAVID SCHERF, M.D.

Arch Intern Med. 1941;67(2):372-382.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

As evolution proceeded, the muscular connection between auricles and ventricles gradually diminished. In the piscine heart, junctional fibers are present and conduct equally well in either direction at the whole circumference of the auriculoventricular border. In the amphibian heart, some parts of the junctional tissue conduct better than others; in some sections, reversed, or ventriculoauricular, conduction is even more rapid than normal, or auriculoventricular, conduction. Differences in conductivity are even more pronounced in the reptilian heart, and a reduction in the amount of conduction tissue has occurred.¹ Differentiation and specialization are still more evident in the avian heart, and in the mammalian heart the relatively small auriculoventricular conduction system furnishes the only morphologic connection between auricles and ventricles. Thus, functional differentiation may be assumed to have preceded anatomic alteration and reduction.

A second communication between auricles and ventricles in man has been suggested as an atavistic, inherited anomaly occurring . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
NEW YORK

Footnotes
From the New York Medical College and the Flower and Fifth Avenue Hospitals. Aided by a grant from the Ella Sachs Plotz Foundation.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?