You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 69 No. 3, MARCH 1942 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Book Reviews
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Roentgen Density of the Cystine Calculus: A Roentgenographic and Experimental Study, Including a Comparison with More Common Uroliths.

By Axel Renander, Chief, Roentgen Department, Centrallasarettet, Västerås, Sweden. Translated from the Swedish by Catherine Djurklou. Acta radiol. supp. XLI. Price, 15 kronor. Pp. 147, with 66 figures and 22 tables. Stockholm: P. A. Norstedt & Söner, 1941.

Arch Intern Med. 1942;69(3):547-548.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In the general opinion of radiologists and urologists and according to current expressions of opinion in textbooks, cystine calculi are difficult to visualize on roentgenologic examination. In a review of 37 cases of cystinuria reported in Sweden, the author found that the condition in 27 was complicated by the formation of calculi. In 18 of the 27 cases a roentgenologic study had been made prior to operation, and in 15 of these 18 cases available cystine calculi were examined roentgenographically with respect to structure and investigated photometrically for the purpose of studying their roentgen density.

In the 18 cases 13 patients were men and 5 were women. The first symptoms of lithiasis usually appeared between the ages of 20 and 25 years, although the age at onset varied from 1I/2 to 64 years. As a rule, the patient had stone symptoms for four or five years before a diagnosis of . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1942 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.