You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 70 No. 5, NOVEMBER 1942 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

SULFONAMIDE COMPOUNDS IN THERAPY OF BACTERIAL ENDOCARDITIS

A COMPARISON OF THE IN VITRO INHIBITORY EFFECTS AND THE BACTERIOSTATIC ACTIVITY

EDWARD S. ORGAIN, M.D.; MARY A. POSTON, M.A.

Arch Intern Med. 1942;70(5):777-784.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Since the introduction of sulfonamide compounds into clinical medicine new interest has been awakened in the chemotherapy of bacterial endocarditis. In recent years the clinical effectiveness of these compounds has been demonstrated1 in a small yet hopeful number of patients suffering from this generally fatal disease. In a previous communication2 considerable variability was noted in the inhibitory effects in vitro of sulfonamide compounds on the growth of certain organisms isolated from human beings with bacterial endocarditis. The preliminary subjecting of each organism to the reaction of the several drugs in vitro prior to the institution of therapy would seem to be a rational and important procedure, provided that in vitro inhibition can be correlated with clinical bacteriostatic activity. Opinion with regard to the degree of correlation of in vitro and in vivo (animal experiments) studies is divided.3 Long and Bliss4 expressed the belief that there is . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

DURHAM, N. C.

From the Departments of Medicine and Bacteriology, Duke University School of Medicine and Duke Hospital.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1942 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.