You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 79 No. 4, APRIL 1947 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Book Reviews
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Electrocardiography in Practice.

By Ashton Graybiel, M.D., and Paul D. White, M.D. Second edition. Price, $7. Pp. 458, with 323 illustrations. Philadelphia and London: W. B. Saunders Company, 1946.

Arch Intern Med. 1947;79(4):474.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Electrocardiography may be approached from two standpoints. First, there is the use and interpretation of the tracings by the general physician. He must know the elements of electrocardiographic interpretation and be able to recognize the changes of important conditions such as auricular fibrillation or complete heart block. Second, there is the study of the meaning in cardiac physiology of more esoteric changes in the electrocardiogram, and here one enters the field of research and the domain of the expert. While the present work is thoroughly done and deals comprehensively with the subject, its main purpose is still to help and instruct the physician in understanding and interpreting tracings. The general introductory matter, the abundant illustrations and the clinical notes all help in carrying out this purpose, and the book is to be highly recommended as an instructive and readable treatise, comprehensive enough but not going into controversial matters enough to . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1947 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.