You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 83 No. 4, APRIL 1949 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

ANTIBODY RESPONSE IN PATIENTS WITH HYPOPROTEINEMIA

With Special Reference to the Effect of Supplementation with Protein or Protein Hydrolysate

MICHAEL G. WOHL, M.D.; JOHN G. REINHOLD, Ph.D.; S. BRANDT ROSE, M.D.

Arch Intern Med. 1949;83(4):402-415.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

IMMUNITY is dependent in part on antibody production. There is ample evidence that antibodies are globulins modified in response to the presence of an antigen.1 Antibody globulins, like other plasma proteins and body proteins as well, are derived from dietary protein and thus depend for their formation on protein intake adequate in quality and quantity.2 Furthermore, the fundamental studies of Cannon and his co-workers3 and of others4 have shown that antibody production is lessened when hypoproteinemia is produced in experimental animals. Wissler and others5 demonstrated that protein repletion is associated with improved antibody response. The degree of protein depletion required to impair production of antibodies in animals was rather drastic in many of the experiments cited, and the relative importance of their observations as they relate to human antibody response has been challenged.6

Because of the clinical implications of these experimental studies, we have (1) investigated production of antibodies in . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

With the Assistance of L. ASHBY ADAMS, M.D.; THOMAS HARVEY, M.D.; MOSES FRANCIS, M.D., and GEORGE CLOUGH PHILADELPHIA

From the Medical Services, Division of Chemistry and Division of Bacteriology, Philadelphia General Hospital.


Footnotes

This study was made possible by a grant from the National Drug Company. Dr. Gustav Martin and Mr. Steven Horoschak contributed their interest and support.

Read before the Section on Experimental Medicine and Therapeutics at the Ninety-Seventh Annual Session of the American Medical Association, Chicago, June 1948.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1949 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.