This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

A Review

DAVID FISKE, M.D.

Arch Intern Med. 1949;83(6):593-607.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

CLASSIC descriptions of the ataxias in textbooks are short and convincing, comprising two or three paragraphs, and frequently giving the impression that all of importance is known and well established. Certain "classic, pathognomonic" characteristics are described, with the knowledge of which one can make the diagnosis infallibly: For example, Friedreich's toe indicates Friedreich's ataxia; the Charcot triad, multiple sclerosis. Whereas a certain amount of dogmatism is necessary and may even be justifiable for didactic purposes, the fact remains that a false sense of security is established in an effort to avoid controversial issues.

Examination of the literature discloses considerable confusion concerning ataxia. The confusion is further emphasized by the absence of an adequate review of the subject.

It is felt, therefore, that the present attempt to summarize some of the pertinent data in the literature and associated efforts to simplify the classification of ataxia may be of help to the . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
LOS ANGELES

From the Department of Medicine, Wadsworth General Hospital, Veterans Administration Center.

Footnotes
Published with the permission of the Chief Medical Director, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Veterans Administration, who assumes no responsibility for the opinions expressed or conclusions drawn by the author.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?