You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 85 No. 6, JUNE 1950 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (14)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

ASPIRATION BIOPSY OF BONE MARROW AS AN AID IN DIAGNOSIS OF HISTOPLASMOSIS

Report of a Case

PEYTON T. PRATT, M.D.; STEVEN O. SCHWARTZ, M.D.; LEE EHRLICH, M.D.

Arch Intern Med. 1950;85(6):893-899.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

MEDICAL history is replete with examples of diseases previously unknown that suddenly became commonplace. In the case of infectious diseases there is always an element of doubt whether the malady is actually becoming more widespread or is simply being more widely recognized. Evidence gleaned from experience with noninfectious diseases points to the latter possibility. So it seems with histoplasmosis. Between the first description by Darling1 in 1906 and the review of the subject by Parsons and Zarafonetis2 in 1945, only 71 cases were reported. Yet, from 1945 to 1949 an additional 42 cases3 of proved histoplasmosis have been recorded, and there are those who feel that the disease is sufficiently common to be responsible for much of the pulmonary calcification previously attributed to tuberculosis.4

The protean manifestations of histoplasmosis make diagnosis difficult, and neither in vivo (skin) nor in vitro (precipitin) tests have been found completely . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

CHICAGO

From the Hematology Laboratory and the Hektoen Institute for Medical Research of the Cook County Hospital.


Footnotes

Aided by grants from the Olivia Sue Dvore and Robert L. Goldblatt Foundations and the Wilson Laboratories.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1950 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.