You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 87 No. 3, MARCH 1951 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

ANTISTREPTOLYSIN O RESPONSE FOLLOWING HEMOLYTIC STREPTOCOCCUS INFECTION IN EARLY CHILDHOOD

LOWELL A. RANTZ, M.D.; MARGARET MARONEY, M.D.; JOSEPH M. DI CAPRIO, M.D.

AMA Arch Intern Med. 1951;87(3):360-371.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

HEMOLYTIC Streptococcus infections in humans beings have been intensively studied during the last 20 years particularly because of the intimate association of these disorders with acute rheumatic fever.1 The subjects of nearly all these investigations have been in one of two categories. One group has been composed of persons, usually children, in whom the rheumatic state or acute nephritis was already established.2 The other has consisted of young adults, often military personnel, in whom detailed analyses of the natural history of acute streptococcic respiratory infection and its nonsuppurative sequelae have been made.3

Surprisingly few studies have been made of the course and associated immunologic phenomena in group A Streptococcus infection in nonrheumatic infants and children, although the diseases caused by these organisms are unusual in civilian life in any age groups but these. Most important has been the report of Powers and Boisvert,4 which clearly defined the changing pattern of . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

SAN FRANCISCO

From the Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, San Francisco.


Footnotes

This investigation was conducted under the auspices of the Commission on Acute Respiratory Diseases, Armed Forces Epidemiological Board, aided by a grant from the Life Insurance Medical Research Fund, and supported in part by a research grant from the National Heart Institute of the National Institutes of Health, United States Public Health Service.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1951 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.