You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 88 No. 3, SEPTEMBER 1951 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

EFFECT OF LARGE DOSES OF AUREOMYCIN ON HUMAN LIVER

MARK H. LEPPER, M.D.; CHARLES K. WOLFE, M.D.; HYMAN J. ZIMMERMAN, M.D.; ESTON R. CALDWELL, Jr., M.D.; HAROLD W. SPIES, M.D.; HARRY F. DOWLING, M.D.

AMA Arch Intern Med. 1951;88(3):271-283.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

AUREOMYCIN k and has exhibited a minimum of toxic reactions.1 The reports of toxicity have been limited almost exclusively to gastrointestinal symptoms after oral medication and chemical thrombophlebitis after intravenous administration. Rarely, chills, malaise, nausea, dizziness, and lower-back pain have been observed in patients during and immediately after rapid intravenous injections.2 Local pain has accompanied intramuscular or subcutaneous administration. An occasional allergic-type reaction has also been reported.3

We have administered aureomycin4 intravenously to a number of seriously ill patients. Because of the severity of their illnesses, they were given large intravenous doses of aureomycin, occasionally for a long period and, in many cases, oral doses of aureomycin in addition. The great majority of the patients who received aureomycin intravenously showed no evidence of toxic or side reactions other than those mentioned above. A few patients, however, who were given what we now consider to be . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

CHICAGO; WASHINGTON, D. C.; CHICAGO

From the Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago; the George Washington and Georgetown Medical Divisions, Gallinger Municipal Hospital, and the Departments of Medicine, George Washington and Georgetown Universities, Washington, D. C.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1951 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.