You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 88 No. 5, NOVEMBER 1951 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Case Reports
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

NONSPECIFIC GRANULOMA OF RECTUM AND SIGMOID COLON

Lesions of Rectum and Sigmoid Colon Which Clinically Simulated Cancer but Which Responded to Aureomycin Therapy

MARTIN S. BELLE, M.D.; SIDNEY FOX, M.D.; RALPH ALLEN, M.D.

AMA Arch Intern Med. 1951;88(5):685-691.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

ADISCUSSION of the etiological basis for benign granulomatous lesions of the rectum and sigmoid colon usually includes lymphogranuloma venereum, syphilis, tuberculosis, amebiasis, gonorrhea, and schistosomiasis.1 One encounters infrequently such lesions in a medical ward in a general hospital or in the practice of internal medicine. The differential diagnosis between a benign and a carcinomatous lesion is sometimes difficult. In view of this fact we thought it important to record our experience with two patients who presented this problem.

Two cases of granulomatous lesion of the rectum and sigmoid have been observed. From historical data and the results of physical examination, including proctosigmoidoscopy, the lesions were thought to be malignant, but after thorough study, including biopsy, they were proved to be nonspecific granulomas. The response of these lesions to aureomycin therapy was unexpected and most unusual and saved the patients from a resection of the colon and rectum that would . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

CORAL GABLES, FLA.

From the Veterans Administration Hospital.


Footnotes

Dr. Belle is attendant in internal medicine.

Dr. Fox is former senior resident in internal medicine.

Dr. Allen is attendant in proctology.

Sponsored by the Veterans Administration and published with the approval of the Chief Medical Director. The statements and conclusions published by the authors are a result of their own study and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or policy of the Veterans Administration.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1951 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.