You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 90 No. 5, NOVEMBER 1952 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Books
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The 1951 Year Book of Pathology and Clinical Pathology.

Section on pathology edited by Howard T. Karsner, M.D., LL.D. Section on clinical pathology edited by Arthur H. Sanford, M.D. Price, $5.50. Pp. 454, with 147 illustrations. The Year Book Publishers, Inc., 200 E. Illinois St., Chicago 11, 1952.

AMA Arch Intern Med. 1952;90(5):728-729.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

This useful little book, which reviews the progress in pathology and clinical pathology during 1951, lives up to the fine reputation earned by previous editions. The section on pathology covers both general and special pathology. It includes special articles on epidemic hemorrhagic fever and the pathogenesis of arteriosclerosis in human beings and birds, as well as numerous abstracts of articles covering the wide field of pathology. The section on clinical pathology gives new techniques in hematology, chemistry, bacteriology, serology, parasitology, and clinical microscopy.

The abstracts are representative of recent work in the specialty of pathology, are well written, and are complete enough to be useful. The editors usually indicate when the original article should be consulted for details and usually give the general background against which the article should be critically evaluated. This is most helpful. In the abstracts of the articles dealing with clinical pathology, the details of technique . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1952 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.