You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 92 No. 6, DECEMBER 1953 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

PHRENIC OR POSTEMPHYSEMATOUS HYPERTENSION

CHARLES F. GESCHICKTER, M.D.; ANTOINETTE POPOVICI, M.D.

AMA Arch Intern Med. 1953;92(6):767-788.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

THE EXTENT of the concept of essential hypertension, after subtracting secondary forms related to increased cardiac output, increased intracranial pressure, and lesions of the adrenals or anomalies of the kidney, is largely determined by the standards chosen for the upper limits of normal blood pressure. Bell1 states that blood pressure of 140/90 mm. Hg or higher occurs in about 50% of men and 60% of women over the age of 40. On the other hand, Master and co-workers2 found in patients of 44 years of age and over an incidence of hypertension varying from 22 to 35%, taking as the upper limits of normal 150/100 mm. Hg. The consensus of statistics indicates that the incidence of hypertension in the general population is between 20 and 25%, if 95 mm. Hg for the diastolic pressure is taken as the dividing line between normal and abnormal. Recently Master and co-workers . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

WASHINGTON, D. C.

From the Department of Pathology, Georgetown University Medical Center.


Footnotes

This study was supported by a grant from the Geschickter Fund for Medical Research.

Read before the Section on Pathology and Physiology at the 102nd Annual Session of the American Medical Association, New York, June 2, 1953.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1953 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.