You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 95 No. 1, JANUARY 1955 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PROGRESS IN INTERNAL MEDICINE
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

REVIEW OF NEUROPSYCHIATRY

STANLEY S. COBB, M.D.

AMA Arch Intern Med. 1955;95(1):129-136.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

IN A REMARKABLY useful book on the frontal areas of the human cerebral cortex, Greenblatt and Solomon have edited and assembled the work of a notable team of 53 research workers at the Boston Psychopathic Hospital. The title of the book is "Frontal Lobes and Schizophrenia," 1 but the scope of the work is broader than "schizophrenia" would imply. The comparative anatomy and physiology of the frontal areas are discussed, and pertinent animal experiments are described. A brief review is given of former work on the frontal areas of man both at the Boston Psychopathic Hospital and elsewhere. Then a detailed description is given of the methods applied to the 116 cases included in the present study. It is the breadth of view and variety of investigative approaches that make this study unique. Other authors, like Rylander, have carefully followed up their postlobotomy patients and have considered social and family . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Boston


Footnotes

The terminology is confused. Some authors use the terms Adrenalin and nor-Adrenalin; others say epinephrine and norepinephrine. I prefer epinephrine and nor-Adrenalin, for their auditory contrast. [Editor's note: The A. M. A. Press requires that the terminology for drugs accepted by the United States Pharmacopeia, the National Formulary, and the Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry be used in its publications. Therefore, epinephrine and arterenol have been used in this instance.]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1955 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.