You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 97 No. 5, MAY 1956 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (412)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Contribution to the Philosophy of medicine

The Basic Models of the Doctor-Patient Relationship

THOMAS S. SZASZ, M.D.; MARC H. HOLLENDER, M.D.

AMA Arch Intern Med. 1956;97(5):585-592.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

INTRODUCTION

When a person leaves the culture in which he was born and raised and migrates to another, he usually experiences his new social setting as something strange—and in some ways threatening—and he is stimulated to master it by conscious efforts at understanding. To some extent every immigrant to the United States reacts in this manner to the American scene. Similarly, the American tourist in Europe or South America "scrutinizes" the social setting which is taken for granted by the natives. To scrutinize—and criticize—the pattern of other peoples' lives is obviously both common and easy. It also happens, however, that people exposed to cross cultural experiences turn their attention to the very customs which formed the social matrix of their lives in the past. Lastly, to study the "customs" which shape and govern one's day-to-day life is most difficult of all.1

In many ways the psychoanalyst is like a . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Bethesda, Md.; Chicago


Footnotes

Received for publication Aug. 17, 1955.

The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private ones of the writers, and are not to be construed as official or reflecting the view of the Navy Department or the Naval Service at large.

Commander (MC), U. S. N. R.; Department of Psychiatry, U. S. Naval Hospital, National Naval Medical Center; Staff Member, Institute for Psychoanalysis, Chicago, on leave of absence (Dr. Szasz), and Staff Member, Institute for Psychoanalysis, and Associate Professor of Psychiatry, University of Illinois College of Medicine (Dr. Hollender).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1956 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.