You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 97 No. 5, MAY 1956 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  BOOKS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Nutritions in Infections.

Edited by Roy Waldo Miner, M.D., Conference Chairman, and Consulting Editor W. Alan Wright. Price, not given. Pp. 173, with many illustrations. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2 East 63d St., New York 21, 1955.

William B. Bean, M.D., Reviewer

AMA Arch Intern Med. 1956;97(5):655-656.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The logical inference that there must be some connection between the nutritional state of the host and the susceptibility and reaction to infections has led to a great deal of work. Much of it is far short of definitive. Some is contradictory and confusing. Even the most faint-hearted believer in the importance of an ecological approach to disease who knows the intricacies of multiple causality can get little encouragement from reading most of the articles in this symposium. The contributions of Axelrod, Horwitt, and Kinsell, based on their long, painstaking, and critical studies, set a high level of performance, which unfortunately is not reached in other papers. The bleak eye of a skeptic finds too many papers proposed as scientific studies which do no credit to their enthusiastic and uncritical authors. It is melancholy to read even one paper presenting wholly unconvincing data and drawing sweeping conclusions. Here we have . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1956 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.