You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 98 No. 5, NOVEMBER 1956 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Aspects of Allergy Research.

Edited by D. Harley and P. Kallós. Price, $6.50. Pp. 198, with 76 illustrations. S. Karger A.G., Arnold Böcklinstrasse 25, Basel, Switzerland, 1955.

AMA Arch Intern Med. 1956;98(5):673-674.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

This booklet is a collection of twenty papers read at the first symposium of the Collegium Internationale Allergologicum in London, October, 1954. The subject material is diversified, but almost half of the papers deal with histamine, antihistaminics, or adrenal steroids. These are comprehensive and well supported by bibliographic and original data.

The immunological mechanisms in allergic disease are reviewed by Prausnitz. It is evident that only limited advances have been made in identification and characterization of the reagin since his historic demonstration of its skin-sensitizing characteristic by passive transfer in 1921. The absence of a reference to the work of Cooke and Loveless in his discussions of the blocking antibody is conspicuous in an otherwise well-documented paper. This is especially so, since he made the statement that blocking antibodies have a higher affinity for the cell than the reagins, which is contrary to the extensive studies of Cooke and Loveless, . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1956 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.