You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 98 No. 5, NOVEMBER 1956 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Collagen Diseases.

Volume 2. By John H. Talbott and R. Moleres Ferrandis. Price, $6.50. Pp. 232, with 30 figures and 16 color plates. Grune & Stratton, Inc., 381 Fourth Ave., New York 16, 1956.

AMA Arch Intern Med. 1956;98(5):676.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

There is much doubt as to whether Klemperer's invention of the term collagen diseases has served a useful purpose or has been an impediment in our understanding of disseminated lupus erythematosus, polyarteritis, dermatomyositis, scleroderma, and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, which Talbott and Ferrandis have included in their monograph entitled "Collagen Diseases." As with many catch phrases or slogans, the words have taken on new meaning. The crux of the matter is very simple. Are the proliferations of collagen, the formation of fibrinoid necrosis, and other changes which characterize the various so-called collagen diseases a result of a multitude of stimuli affecting various tissues but leading to similar results because the reactivity of tissues is limited, or is a single kind of stimulus operating in each of the various disorders whose clinical manifestations and natural history differ from case to case because of the inherent variability of living organisms? There is no . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1956 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.