<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org">
<title>Archives of Internal Medicine current issue</title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org</link>
<description>Archives of Internal Medicine, a biweekly peer-reviewed, primary source journal, is widely recognized by physicians as the most relevant and practical journal in its specialty. Each issue offers a spectrum of articles relevant to everyday practice in general IM and subspecialty areas.</description>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>Nov 23 2009 12:00:00:000AM</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Archives of Internal Medicine</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0003-9926</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/nmed.2009.446v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1942?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1944?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1945?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1949?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1952?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1961?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1966?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1968?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1969?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1976?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1985?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1988?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1996?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/2003?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/2011?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/2018?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/2024?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/2031?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/2031-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/2032?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/2032-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/2033?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/icons/misc/titlereprint.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/icons/misc/titlereprint.gif">
<title>Archives of Internal Medicine</title>
<url>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/icons/misc/titlereprint.gif</url>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/nmed.2009.446v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is It Time to Eliminate Consultation Codes?: An Analysis of Impact and Rationale [Special Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/nmed.2009.446v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> As issues of health care cost escalation and parity of payment between primary care and other physicians have become more important, one proposal has been to eliminate consultation codes. Little is known about the current payment accuracy or financial impact of such a change.</p><p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> To assess the impact of consultation code elimination, 2 assessments were conducted. First, from June 1, 2008, to July 1, 2009, 500 consecutive referrals from primary care physicians to other specialists were reviewed and matched with claims for accuracy of coding and billing. Second, to evaluate the financial impact of this change, year 2007 data on outpatient consultations from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services were reviewed.</p><p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Of the 500 claims reviewed, 466 were appropriate for analysis. Overall, the coding error rate was 32.4%. When the requesting physician ordered a consultation, the error rate was 5.5%; however, with lower paid referral requests, the error rate was 78.0%. Changing ambulatory consultation codes to those for new patient visits would save Medicare $534.5 million per year.</p><p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Consultation codes are being billed erroneously at a high rate. Furthermore, the differential cost to Medicare of these codes over those for new patient evaluation and management codes is over half a billion dollars per year. With the growing needs for cost savings as well as encouraging payment parity for cognitive services for primary care physicians, it is time these codes are reevaluated.</p><p>Published online November 9, 2009 (doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.446).</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shalowitz, J. I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:39:34 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Medical Practice, Medical Practice, Other, Primary Care/ Family Medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.446</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is It Time to Eliminate Consultation Codes?: An Analysis of Impact and Rationale [Special Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Special Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1942?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[About This Journal [About This Journal]]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1942?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:51:31 PST</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[About This Journal [About This Journal]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>21</prism:number>
<prism:volume>169</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1942</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1942</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>About This Journal</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1944?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[In This Issue of Archives of Internal Medicine [In This Issue of Archives of Internal Medicine]]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1944?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:51:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.391</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[In This Issue of Archives of Internal Medicine [In This Issue of Archives of Internal Medicine]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>21</prism:number>
<prism:volume>169</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1944</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1944</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>In This Issue of Archives of Internal Medicine</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1945?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Home Is Where the Health Is: Advancing Team-Based Care in Chronic Disease Management [Editorial]]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1945?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lipton, H. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:51:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Medical Practice, Medical Practice, Other, Primary Care/ Family Medicine, Quality of Care, Quality of Care, Other, Health Care Reform, Drug Therapy, Adverse Effects]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.428</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Home Is Where the Health Is: Advancing Team-Based Care in Chronic Disease Management [Editorial]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>21</prism:number>
<prism:volume>169</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1948</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1945</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1949?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Thyrotropin Blood Levels, Subclinical Hypothyroidism, and the Elderly Patient [Editorial]]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1949?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Klubo-Gwiezdzinska, J., Wartofsky, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:51:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Endocrine Disease of Head & Neck, Endocrine Diseases, Thyroid/ Parathyroid Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.415</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Thyrotropin Blood Levels, Subclinical Hypothyroidism, and the Elderly Patient [Editorial]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>21</prism:number>
<prism:volume>169</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1951</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1949</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1952?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Meta-analysis of the Impact of 9 Medication Classes on Falls in Elderly Persons [Review Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1952?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> There is increasing recognition that the use of certain medications contributes to falls in seniors. Our objective was to update a previously completed meta-analysis looking at the association of medication use and falling to include relevant drug classes and new studies that have been completed since a previous meta-analysis.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> Studies were identified through a systematic search of English-language articles published from 1996 to 2007. We identified studies that were completed on patients older than 60 years, looking at the association between medication use and falling. Bayesian methods allowed us to combine the results of a previous meta-analysis with new information to estimate updated Bayesian odds ratios (ORs) and 95% credible intervals (95% CrIs)</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Of 11&nbsp;118 identified articles, 22 met our inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses were completed on 9 unique drug classes, including 79&nbsp;081 participants, with the following Bayesian unadjusted OR estimates: antihypertensive agents, OR, 1.24 (95% CrI, 1.01-1.50); diuretics, OR, 1.07 (95% CrI, 1.01-1.14); &beta;-blockers, OR, 1.01 (95% CrI, 0.86-1.17); sedatives and hypnotics, OR, 1.47 (95% CrI, 1.35-1.62); neuroleptics and antipsychotics, OR, 1.59 (95% CrI, 1.37-1.83); antidepressants, OR, 1.68 (95% CrI, 1.47-1.91); benzodiazepines, OR, 1.57 (95% CrI, 1.43-1.72); narcotics, OR, 0.96 (95% CrI, 0.78-1.18); and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, OR, 1.21 (95% CrI, 1.01-1.44). The updated Bayesian adjusted OR estimates for diuretics, neuroleptics and antipsychotics, antidepressants, and benzodiazepines were 0.99 (95% CrI, 0.78-1.25), 1.39 (95% CrI, 0.94-2.00), 1.36 (95% CrI, 1.13-1.76), and 1.41 (95% CrI, 1.20-1.71), respectively. Stratification of studies had little effect on Bayesian OR estimates, with only small differences in the stratified ORs observed across population (for &beta;-blockers and neuroleptics and antipsychotics) and study type (for sedatives and hypnotics, benzodiazepines, and narcotics). An increased likelihood of falling was estimated for the use of sedatives and hypnotics, neuroleptics and antipsychotics, antidepressants, benzodiazepines, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in studies considered to have "good" medication and falls ascertainment.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> The use of sedatives and hypnotics, antidepressants, and benzodiazepines demonstrated a significant association with falls in elderly individuals.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Woolcott, J. C., Richardson, K. J., Wiens, M. O., Patel, B., Marin, J., Khan, K. M., Marra, C. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:51:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Psychiatry, Depression, Psychopharmacology, Public Health, Injury Prevention & Control, Quality of Care, Evidence-Based Medicine, Review, Drug Therapy, Adverse Effects]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.357</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Meta-analysis of the Impact of 9 Medication Classes on Falls in Elderly Persons [Review Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>21</prism:number>
<prism:volume>169</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1960</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1952</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1961?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Prevalence of Clinically Relevant Incidental Findings on Chest Computed Tomographic Angiograms Ordered to Diagnose Pulmonary Embolism [Original Investigation]]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1961?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Chest computed tomographic angiograms (CTAs) are frequently ordered for evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) in the emergency department, but non-PE findings are often noted. Our objective was to determine the prevalence and management implications of incidental findings on chest CTAs ordered to assess for PE.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> In a cross-sectional study, we reviewed 589 pulmonary CTAs that were ordered in the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital. We measured the prevalence of PE and placed other findings into the following 3 categories: (1) findings that provided potential alternative explanations for acute symptoms, (2) incidental findings that required clinical or radiologic follow-up, and (3) other findings that required less urgent or no follow-up. We reviewed all newly diagnosed pulmonary nodules and significant thoracic adenopathy and determined standard recommended clinical follow-up.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Pulmonary embolism was found in 55 of 589 CTAs (9%). A total of 195 CTAs (33%) had findings that supported alternative diagnoses. A total of 141 patients (24%) had a new incidental finding that required diagnostic follow-up, including 73 patients (13%) with a new pulmonary nodule and 51 patients (9%) with new adenopathy. Using current clinical guidelines, follow-up computed tomography or another procedure would be recommended for 96% of patients with new incidental pulmonary nodules.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> The CTAs that are ordered in the emergency department are more than twice as likely to find an incidental pulmonary nodule or adenopathy than a PE. Systematic approaches should be developed to help primary care physicians contend with a growing number of clinically relevant incidental radiologic findings.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hall, W. B., Truitt, S. G., Scheunemann, L. P., Shah, S. A., Rivera, M. P., Parker, L. A., Carson, S. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:51:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Venous Thromboembolism, Cardiovascular System, Radiologic Imaging, Diagnosis, Angiology, Computed Tomography, PET/ SPECT Imaging, Emergency Medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.360</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Prevalence of Clinically Relevant Incidental Findings on Chest Computed Tomographic Angiograms Ordered to Diagnose Pulmonary Embolism [Original Investigation]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>21</prism:number>
<prism:volume>169</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1965</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1961</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1966?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiography to Diagnose Acute Pulmonary Embolism: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Comment on "The Prevalence of Clinically Relevant Incidental Findings on Chest Computed Tomographic Angiograms Ordered to Diagnose Pulmonary Embolism" [Invited Commentary]]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1966?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schattner, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:51:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Venous Thromboembolism, Cardiovascular System, Radiologic Imaging, Diagnosis, Angiology, Computed Tomography, PET/ SPECT Imaging, Emergency Medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.400</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiography to Diagnose Acute Pulmonary Embolism: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Comment on "The Prevalence of Clinically Relevant Incidental Findings on Chest Computed Tomographic Angiograms Ordered to Diagnose Pulmonary Embolism" [Invited Commentary]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>21</prism:number>
<prism:volume>169</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1968</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1966</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Commentary</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1968?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Error in Abstract in: Risk of Hyperkalemia in Nondiabetic Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Receiving Antihypertensive Therapy [Correction]]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1968?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:51:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Renal Diseases, Renal Diseases, Other, Drug Therapy, Adverse Effects, Drug Therapy, Other, Hypertension]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.393</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Error in Abstract in: Risk of Hyperkalemia in Nondiabetic Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Receiving Antihypertensive Therapy [Correction]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>21</prism:number>
<prism:volume>169</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1968</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1968</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correction</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1969?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Costs and Consequences of Direct-to-Consumer Advertising for Clopidogrel in Medicaid [Original Investigation]]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1969?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) is assumed to be a major driver of rising pharmaceutical costs. Yet, research on how it affects costs is limited. Therefore, we studied clopidogrel, a commonly used and heavily marketed antiplatelet agent, which was first sold in 1998 and first direct-to-consumer advertised in 2001.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> We examined pharmacy data from 27 Medicaid programs from 1999 through 2005. We used interrupted time series analysis to analyze changes in the number of units dispensed, cost per unit dispensed, and total pharmacy expenditures after DTCA initiation.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> In 1999 and 2000, there was no DTCA for clopidogrel; from 2001 through 2005, DTCA spending exceeded $350 million. Direct-to-consumer advertising did not change the preexisting trend in the number of clopidogrel units dispensed per 1000 enrollees (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.10). However, there was a sudden and sustained increase in cost per unit of $0.40 after DTCA initiation (95% confidence interval, $0.31-$0.49; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001), leading to an additional $40.58 of pharmacy costs per 1000 enrollees per quarter thereafter (95% confidence interval, $22.61-$58.56; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). Overall, this change resulted in an additional $207 million in total pharmacy expenditures.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Direct-to-consumer advertising was not associated with an increase in clopidogrel use over and above preexisting trends. However, Medicaid pharmacy expenditures increased substantially after the initiation of DTCA because of a concomitant increase in the cost per unit. If drug price increases after DTCA initiation are common, there are important implications for payers and for policy makers in the United States and elsewhere.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Law, M. R., Soumerai, S. B., Adams, A. S., Majumdar, S. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:51:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiovascular System, Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Health Care Reform, Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction, Drug Therapy, Adverse Effects, Drug Therapy, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.320</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Costs and Consequences of Direct-to-Consumer Advertising for Clopidogrel in Medicaid [Original Investigation]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>21</prism:number>
<prism:volume>169</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1974</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1969</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1976?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pooled Analysis of Rofecoxib Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Data: Lessons for Postmarket Pharmaceutical Safety Surveillance [Original Investigation]]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1976?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> In September 2004, rofecoxib was voluntarily withdrawn from the worldwide market. Our objective was to determine whether and when analysis of published and unpublished placebo-controlled trials could have revealed cardiovascular risk associated with rofecoxib before its withdrawal as an example to inform future postmarket pharmaceutical safety surveillance efforts.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> We conducted a cumulative subject-level pooled analysis of data from all randomized, placebo-controlled trials of rofecoxib conducted by the manufacturer before September 2004. Our main outcome measurement was incidence of any investigator-reported death from any cause or cardiovascular thromboembolic (CVT) adverse event.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> We identified 30 randomized, placebo-controlled trials of rofecoxib that enrolled a combined 20&nbsp;152 subjects. Trial duration ranged from 4 weeks to 4 years; enrollment ranged from 17 to 2586 subjects prescribed either rofecoxib or placebo; and rofecoxib dose ranged from 12.5 mg to 50 mg. As of December 2000, 21 of these trials had been completed (70%), and the risk of a CVT adverse event or death was greater among subjects assigned to the rofecoxib group (rate ratio [RR], 2.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-5.81) (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.07), raising concerns from a safety standpoint. Subsequently collected data through June 2001 showed that rofecoxib was associated with a 35% increased risk of a CVT adverse event or death (RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.00-1.96) (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.05). Analyzing data available as of April 2002, we found a 39% increased risk (RR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.07-1.80) (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.02), and using data available as of September 2004, we found a 43% increased risk (RR,1.43; 95% CI, 1.16-1.76) (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001).</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> Cumulative pooled analysis of all randomized, placebo-controlled trials demonstrates a trend toward increased cardiovascular risk associated with rofecoxib compared with placebo as early as December 2000, the comparison reaching a <I>P</I> value of .05 by June 2001, nearly 31/2 years before the manufacturer's voluntary market withdrawal.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross, J. S., Madigan, D., Hill, K. P., Egilman, D. S., Wang, Y., Krumholz, H. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:51:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiovascular System, Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Statistics and Research Methods, Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction, Drug Therapy, Adverse Effects, Drug Therapy, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.394</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pooled Analysis of Rofecoxib Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Data: Lessons for Postmarket Pharmaceutical Safety Surveillance [Original Investigation]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>21</prism:number>
<prism:volume>169</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1985</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1976</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1985?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bringing the FDA's Information to Market [Invited Commentary]]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1985?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Woloshin, S., Schwartz, L. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:51:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiovascular System, Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Statistics and Research Methods, Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction, Drug Therapy, Adverse Effects, Drug Therapy, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.399</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bringing the FDA's Information to Market [Invited Commentary]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>21</prism:number>
<prism:volume>169</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1987</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1985</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Commentary</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1988?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Case Management to Reduce Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in a County Health Care System [Original Investigation]]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1988?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Case management (CM) is a systematic approach to supplement physician-centered efforts to prevent cardiovascular disease (CVD). Research is limited on its implementation and efficacy in low-income, ethnic minority populations.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> We conducted a randomized clinical trial to evaluate a nurse- and dietitian-led CM program for reducing major CVD risk factors in low-income, primarily ethnic minority patients in a county health care system, 63.0% of whom had type 2 diabetes mellitus. The primary outcome was the Framingham risk score (FRS).</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> A total of 419 patients at elevated risk of CVD events were randomized and followed up for a mean of 16 months (81.4% retention). The mean FRS was significantly lower for the CM vs usual care group at follow-up (7.80 [95% confidence interval, 7.21-8.38] vs 8.93 [8.36-9.49]; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.001) after adjusting for baseline FRS. This is equivalent to 5 fewer heart disease events per 1000 individuals per year attributable to the intervention or to 200 individuals receiving the intervention to prevent 1 event per year. The pattern of group differences in the FRS was similar in subgroups defined a priori by sex and ethnicity. The main driver of these differences was lowering the mean (SD) systolic (&ndash;4.2 [18.5] vs 2.6 [22.7] mm Hg; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.003) and diastolic (&ndash;6.0 [11.6] vs &ndash;3.0 [11.7] mm Hg; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.02) blood pressures for the CM vs usual care group.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> Nurse and dietitian CM targeting multifactor risk reduction can lead to modest improvements in CVD risk factors among high-risk patients in low-income, ethnic minority populations receiving care in county health clinics.</p>
<p><b>Trial Registration&nbsp;</b> clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: <inter-ref locator-type="url" locator="http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00128687">NCT00128687</inter-ref></p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ma, J., Berra, K., Haskell, W. L., Klieman, L., Hyde, S., Smith, M. W., Xiao, L., Stafford, R. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:51:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Medical Practice, Medical Practice, Other, Nursing Care, Public Health, Cardiovascular System, Randomized Controlled Trial, Diet, Health Care Reform, Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.381</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Case Management to Reduce Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in a County Health Care System [Original Investigation]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>21</prism:number>
<prism:volume>169</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1995</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1988</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1996?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Physician and Pharmacist Collaboration to Improve Blood Pressure Control [Original Investigation]]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/1996?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Studies have demonstrated that blood pressure (BP) control can be improved when clinical pharmacists assist with patient management. The objective of this study was to evaluate if a physician and pharmacist collaborative model in community-based medical offices could improve BP control.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> This was a prospective, cluster randomized, controlled clinical trial with clinics randomized to a control group (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;3) or to an intervention group (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;3). The study enrolled 402 patients (mean age, 58.3 years) with uncontrolled hypertension. Clinical pharmacists made drug therapy recommendations to physicians based on national guidelines. Research nurses performed BP measurements and 24-hour BP monitoring.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The mean (SD) guideline adherence scores increased from 49.4 (19.3) at baseline to 53.4 (18.1) at 6 months (8.1% increase) in the control group and from 40.4 (22.6) at baseline to 62.8 (13.5) at 6 months (55.4% increase) in the intervention group (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.09 for adjusted between-group comparison). The mean BP decreased 6.8/4.5 mm Hg in the control group and 20.7/9.7 mm Hg in the intervention group (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.05 for between-group systolic BP comparison). The adjusted difference in systolic BP was &ndash;12.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], &ndash;24.0 to 0.0) mm Hg, while the adjusted difference in diastolic BP was &ndash;1.8 (95% CI, &ndash;11.9 to 8.3) mm Hg. The 24-hour BP levels showed similar effect sizes. Blood pressure was controlled in 29.9% of patients in the control group and in 63.9% of patients in the intervention group (adjusted odds ratio, 3.2; 95% CI, 2.0-5.1; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> A physician and pharmacist collaborative intervention achieved significantly better mean BP and overall BP control rates compared with a control group. Additional research should be conducted to evaluate efficient strategies to implement team-based chronic disease management.</p>
<p><b>Trial Registration&nbsp;</b> clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: <inter-ref locator-type="url" locator="http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00201019">NCT00201019</inter-ref></p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carter, B. L., Ardery, G., Dawson, J. D., James, P. A., Bergus, G. R., Doucette, W. R., Chrischilles, E. A., Franciscus, C. L., Xu, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:51:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care, Treatment Adherence, Randomized Controlled Trial, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Health Care Reform, Drug Therapy, Adherence, Drug Therapy, Other, Hypertension]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.358</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Physician and Pharmacist Collaboration to Improve Blood Pressure Control [Original Investigation]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>21</prism:number>
<prism:volume>169</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>2002</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1996</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/2003?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of a Pharmacist-Facilitated Hospital Discharge Program: A Quasi-Experimental Study [Original Investigation]]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/2003?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Medication discrepancies are common at hospital discharge and can result in adverse events, hospital readmissions, and emergency department visits. Our objectives were to characterize medication discrepancies at hospital discharge and test the effects of a pharmacist intervention on health care utilization following discharge.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> We used a prospective, alternating month quasi-experimental design to compare outcomes of patients receiving the intervention (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;358) with controls (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;366). All patients were discharged to home and were at high risk for medication-related problems following discharge because of the number or types of medications they were prescribed, multiple medication changes during hospitalization, or problems managing medications. The intervention consisted of medication therapy assessment, medication reconciliation, screening for adherence concerns, patient counseling and education, and postdischarge telephone follow-up. The primary outcomes were 14-day and 30-day readmission rates and emergency department visits within 72 hours of discharge. Medication discrepancies occurring at discharge were also characterized.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Medication discrepancies at discharge were identified in 33.5% of intervention patients and 59.6% of control patients (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). Although all discrepancies were resolved in the intervention group prior to discharge, readmission rates did not differ significantly between groups at 14 days (12.6% vs 11.5%; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.65) and 30 days (22.1% vs 18%; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.17), nor did emergency department visits (2.8% vs 2.2%, respectively; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.60).</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> While our intervention improved the quality of patient discharge by identifying and reconciling medication discrepancies at discharge, there was no effect on postdischarge health care resource utilization.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walker, P. C., Bernstein, S. J., Jones, J. N. T., Piersma, J., Kim, H.-W., Regal, R. E., Kuhn, L., Flanders, S. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:51:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Health Care Reform, Drug Therapy, Medication Error]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.398</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of a Pharmacist-Facilitated Hospital Discharge Program: A Quasi-Experimental Study [Original Investigation]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>21</prism:number>
<prism:volume>169</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>2010</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>2003</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/2011?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Subclinical Hypothyroidism and Functional Mobility in Older Adults [Original Investigation]]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/2011?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Health risks associated with subclinical hypothyroidism in older adults are unclear. Our objective was to compare the functional mobility of people aged 70 to 79 years by thyroid function categorized by thyrotropin (TSH) level as euthyroid (&ge;0.4 to &lt;4.5 mIU/L), mild subclinical hypothyroid (&ge;4.5 to &lt;7.0 mIU/L), or moderate subclinical hypothyroid (&ge;7.0 to &le;20.0 mIU/L with a normal free thyroxine level) cross-sectionally and over 2 years.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> A total of 2290 community-dwelling residents participating in the year 2 clinic visit (July 1998&ndash;June 1999) of the Health, Aging, and Body Composition (Health ABC) Study, who had measured TSH level, had the capacity to walk 20 m unaided, and were not taking thyroid medication or had TSH levels consistent with hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism. Main outcome measures included self-reported and performance-based measures of mobility (usual and rapid gait speed and endurance walking ability) assessed at study baseline (year 2) and 2 years later.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> In age- and sex-adjusted analyses, the mild subclinical hypothyroid group (vs the euthyroid group) demonstrated better mobility (faster mean usual and rapid gait speed [1.20 vs 1.15 m/s and 1.65 vs 1.56 m/s, respectively; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001] and had a higher percentage of those with good cardiorespiratory fitness and reported walking ease [39.2% vs 28.0% and 44.7% vs 36.5%, respectively; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001]). After 2 years, persons with mild subclinical hypothyroidism experienced a similar decline as the euthyroid group but maintained their mobility advantage. Persons with moderate subclinical hypothyroidism had similar mobility and mobility decline as the euthyroid group.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> Generally, well-functioning 70- to 79-year-old individuals with subclinical hypothyroidism do not demonstrate increased risk of mobility problems, and those with mild elevations in TSH level show a slight functional advantage.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simonsick, E. M., Newman, A. B., Ferrucci, L., Satterfield, S., Harris, T. B., Rodondi, N., Bauer, D. C., for the Health ABC Study]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:51:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Endocrine Diseases, Thyroid/ Parathyroid Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.392</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Subclinical Hypothyroidism and Functional Mobility in Older Adults [Original Investigation]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>21</prism:number>
<prism:volume>169</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>2017</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>2011</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/2018?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Yield of Bone Marrow Examination in Diagnosing the Source of Fever of Unknown Origin [Original Investigation]]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/2018?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Fever of unknown origin (FUO) still remains a diagnostic challenge, while diagnosis may remain obscure for several weeks or months. The role of tissue biopsy is crucial in the diagnostic approach. We report a series of 130 consecutive patients with FUO who had undergone a bone marrow biopsy (BMB).</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> Among 280 consecutive nonimmunocompromised patients hospitalized between 1995 and 2005 for a febrile illness of uncertain cause, lasting at least 3 weeks, with no diagnosis after an appropriate minimal diagnostic workup, 130 underwent BMB.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Overall, a specific diagnosis was achieved by BMB and histological examination in 31 cases (diagnostic yield, 23.7%). Three types of diseases were found: hematological malignant diseases in 25 cases, including 19 patients with malignant lymphoma, 4 with acute leukemia, 1 with hairy cell leukemia, and 1 with multiple myeloma; infectious diseases in 3 cases; systemic mastocytosis in 2 cases; and disseminated granulomatosis in 1 case. Thrombocytopenia (odds ratio, 4.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-9.30) and anemia (odds ratio, 3.24; 95% CI, 1.13-9.34) were the most reliable predictive factors regarding the usefulness of BMB. Bone marrow cultures had very limited value in our cohort. Finally, corticosteroid use did not seem to affect the yield of BMB.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Bone marrow biopsy is a useful technique for the diagnosis of prolonged fever in immunocompetent patients. Thrombocytopenia and anemia seem to be correlated with the value of this test.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hot, A., Jaisson, I., Girard, C., French, M., Durand, D. V., Rousset, H., Ninet, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:51:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Infectious Diseases, Other, Diagnosis, Hematology/ Hematologic Malignancies, Anemias, Coagulation Disorders, Infectious Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.401</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Yield of Bone Marrow Examination in Diagnosing the Source of Fever of Unknown Origin [Original Investigation]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>21</prism:number>
<prism:volume>169</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>2023</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>2018</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/2024?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Direct-to-Consumer Offers for Free and Discounted Medications on the Internet: A Content Analysis of "e-Samples" [Comments, Opinions, and Brief Case Reports]]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/2024?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:51:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Informatics/ Internet in Medicine, Internet, Health Care Reform, Drug Therapy, Drug Therapy, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.397</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Direct-to-Consumer Offers for Free and Discounted Medications on the Internet: A Content Analysis of "e-Samples" [Comments, Opinions, and Brief Case Reports]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>21</prism:number>
<prism:volume>169</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>2030</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>2024</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Comments, Opinions, and Brief Case Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/2031?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Question of the Clinical Relevance of Determining Thrombomodulin Level While Receiving Anticoagulant Therapy [Editor's Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/2031?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nguyen, C. T., Chan, G. M., Su, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:51:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Thrombolysis, Cardiovascular System, Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction, Drug Therapy, Adverse Effects, Cardiovascular Intervention]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.422</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Question of the Clinical Relevance of Determining Thrombomodulin Level While Receiving Anticoagulant Therapy [Editor's Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>21</prism:number>
<prism:volume>169</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>2031</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>2031</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editor's Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/2031-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Question of the Clinical Relevance of Determining Thrombomodulin Level While Receiving Anticoagulant Therapy--Reply [Editor's Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/2031-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lind, M., Boman, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:51:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Thrombolysis, Cardiovascular System, Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction, Drug Therapy, Adverse Effects, Cardiovascular Intervention]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.423</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Question of the Clinical Relevance of Determining Thrombomodulin Level While Receiving Anticoagulant Therapy--Reply [Editor's Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>21</prism:number>
<prism:volume>169</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>2032</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>2031</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editor's Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/2032?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The International Normalized Ratio Range of 2.0 to 3.0 Remains Appropriate for Atrial Fibrillation [Editor's Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/2032?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Singer, D. E., Fang, M. C., Go, A. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:51:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Neurology, Cerebrovascular Disease, Venous Thromboembolism, Stroke, Cardiovascular System, Arrhythmias, Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction, Drug Therapy, Drug Therapy, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.419</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The International Normalized Ratio Range of 2.0 to 3.0 Remains Appropriate for Atrial Fibrillation [Editor's Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>21</prism:number>
<prism:volume>169</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>2032</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>2032</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editor's Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/2032-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Optimal Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Valvular Heart Disease or Atrial Fibrillation [Editor's Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/2032-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McLeod, C. J., Gersh, B. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:51:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Venous Thromboembolism, Cardiovascular System, Arrhythmias, Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction, Drug Therapy, Drug Therapy, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.420</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Optimal Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Valvular Heart Disease or Atrial Fibrillation [Editor's Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>21</prism:number>
<prism:volume>169</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>2033</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>2032</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editor's Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/2033?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Optimal Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Valvular Heart Disease or Atrial Fibrillation--Reply [Editor's Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/21/2033?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Torn, M., Rosendaal, F. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:51:32 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Venous Thromboembolism, Cardiovascular System, Arrhythmias, Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction, Drug Therapy, Drug Therapy, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.421</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Optimal Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Valvular Heart Disease or Atrial Fibrillation--Reply [Editor's Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>21</prism:number>
<prism:volume>169</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>2033</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>2033</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editor's Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>