<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org">
<title>Archives of Internal Medicine recent issues</title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org</link>
<description>Archives of Internal Medicine, a biweekly peer-reviewed, primary source journal, is widely recognized by physicians as the most relevant and practical journal in its specialty. Each issue offers a spectrum of articles relevant to everyday practice in general IM and subspecialty areas.</description>
<prism:publicationName>Archives of Internal Medicine</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0003-9926</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1602?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1604?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1607?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1609?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1617?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1629?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1638?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1647?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1657?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1664?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1671?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1678?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1684?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1691?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1692?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1699?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1705?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1710?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1712?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1717?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1717-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1718?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1719?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1719-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1719-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1720?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1482?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1484?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1485?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1487?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1493?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1500?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1514?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1522?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1531?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1541?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1550?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1559?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1561?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1568?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1576?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1585?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1592?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1362?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1364?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1365?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1368?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1371?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1387?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1396?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1404?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1409?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1416?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1423?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1430?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1441?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1450?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1458?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1465?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1468?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1468-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1469?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1470?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1470-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1470-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1471?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/12/1242?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/12/1246?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/12/1249?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/12/1252?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/12/1254?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/12/1257?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/12/1259?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/12/1260?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/12/1261?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/12/1269?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/12/1270?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/12/1276?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/12/1277?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/12/1285?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/12/1294?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/12/1300?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/12/1310?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/12/1317?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/12/1325?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/12/1333?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/12/1340?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/12/1350?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/12/1350-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/12/1351?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/12/1352?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/12/1352-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/12/1353?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/icons/misc/titlereprint.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/icons/misc/titlereprint.gif">
<title>Archives of Internal Medicine</title>
<url>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/icons/misc/titlereprint.gif</url>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1602?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ABOUT THIS JOURNAL: About This Journal]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1602?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ABOUT THIS JOURNAL: About This Journal]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>15</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1602</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1602</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>About This Journal</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1604?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[IN THIS ISSUE OF ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE: In This Issue of Archives of Internal Medicine]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1604?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.15.1604</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[IN THIS ISSUE OF ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE: In This Issue of Archives of Internal Medicine]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>15</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1604</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1604</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>In This Issue of Archives of Internal Medicine</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1607?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[EDITORIAL: Body Fat Distribution and Cardiovascular Risk: A Tale of 2 Sites]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1607?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Landsberg, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders, Lipids and Lipid Disorders, Metabolic Diseases, Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders, Other, Public Health, Obesity, Cardiovascular System, Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction, Endocrine Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.15.1607</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[EDITORIAL: Body Fat Distribution and Cardiovascular Risk: A Tale of 2 Sites]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>15</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1608</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1607</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1609?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Identification and Characterization of Metabolically Benign Obesity in Humans]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1609?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Obesity represents a risk factor for insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and atherosclerosis. In addition, for any given amount of total body fat, an excess of visceral fat or fat accumulation in the liver and skeletal muscle augments the risk. Conversely, even in obesity, a metabolically benign fat distribution phenotype may exist.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> In 314 subjects, we measured total body, visceral, and subcutaneous fat with magnetic resonance (MR) tomography and fat in the liver and skeletal muscle with proton MR spectroscopy. Insulin sensitivity was estimated from oral glucose tolerance test results. Subjects were divided into 4 groups: normal weight (body mass index [BMI] [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared], &lt;25.0), overweight (BMI, 25.0-29.9), obese&ndash;insulin sensitive (IS) (BMI, &ge;30.0 and placement in the upper quartile of insulin sensitivity), and obese&ndash;insulin resistant (IR) (BMI, &ge;30.0 and placement in the lower 3 quartiles of insulin sensitivity).</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Total body and visceral fat were higher in the overweight and obese groups compared with the normal-weight group (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.05); however, no differences were observed between the obese groups. In contrast, ectopic fat in skeletal muscle (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001) and particularly the liver (4.3%&nbsp;&plusmn;&nbsp;0.6% vs 9.5%&nbsp;&plusmn;&nbsp;0.8%) and the intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery (0.54&nbsp;&plusmn;&nbsp;0.02 vs 0.59&nbsp;&plusmn;&nbsp;0.01 mm) were lower and insulin sensitivity was higher (17.4&nbsp;&plusmn;&nbsp;0.9 vs 7.3&nbsp;&plusmn;&nbsp;0.3 arbitrary units) in the obese-IS vs the obese-IR group (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.05). Unexpectedly, the obese-IS group had almost identical insulin sensitivity and the intima-media thickness was not statistically different compared with the normal-weight group (18.2&nbsp;&plusmn;&nbsp;0.9 AU and 0.51&nbsp;&plusmn;&nbsp;0.02 mm, respectively).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> A metabolically benign obesity that is not accompanied by insulin resistance and early atherosclerosis exists in humans. Furthermore, ectopic fat in the liver may be more important than visceral fat in the determination of such a beneficial phenotype in obesity.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stefan, N., Kantartzis, K., Machann, J., Schick, F., Thamer, C., Rittig, K., Balletshofer, B., Machicao, F., Fritsche, A., Haring, H.-U.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders, Metabolism, Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders, Other, Public Health, Obesity, Cardiovascular System, Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction, Endocrine Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.15.1609</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Identification and Characterization of Metabolically Benign Obesity in Humans]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>15</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1616</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1609</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1617?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: The Obese Without Cardiometabolic Risk Factor Clustering and the Normal Weight With Cardiometabolic Risk Factor Clustering: Prevalence and Correlates of 2 Phenotypes Among the US Population (NHANES 1999-2004)]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1617?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> The prevalence and correlates of obese individuals who are resistant to the development of the adiposity-associated cardiometabolic abnormalities and normal-weight individuals who display cardiometabolic risk factor clustering are not well known.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> The prevalence and correlates of combined body mass index (normal weight, &lt;25.0; overweight, 25.0-29.9; and obese, &ge;30.0 [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared]) and cardiometabolic groups (metabolically healthy, 0 or 1 cardiometabolic abnormalities; and metabolically abnormal, &ge;2 cardiometabolic abnormalities) were assessed in a cross-sectional sample of 5440 participants of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 1999-2004. Cardiometabolic abnormalities included elevated blood pressure; elevated levels of triglycerides, fasting plasma glucose, and C-reactive protein; elevated homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance value; and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Among US adults 20 years and older, 23.5% (approximately 16.3 million adults) of normal-weight adults were metabolically abnormal, whereas 51.3% (approximately 35.9 million adults) of overweight adults and 31.7% (approximately 19.5 million adults) of obese adults were metabolically healthy. The independent correlates of clustering of cardiometabolic abnormalities among normal-weight individuals were older age, lower physical activity levels, and larger waist circumference. The independent correlates of 0 or 1 cardiometabolic abnormalities among overweight and obese individuals were younger age, non-Hispanic black race/ethnicity, higher physical activity levels, and smaller waist circumference.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Among US adults, there is a high prevalence of clustering of cardiometabolic abnormalities among normal-weight individuals and a high prevalence of overweight and obese individuals who are metabolically healthy. Further study into the physiologic mechanisms underlying these different phenotypes and their impact on health is needed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wildman, R. P., Muntner, P., Reynolds, K., McGinn, A. P., Rajpathak, S., Wylie-Rosett, J., Sowers, M. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders, Metabolism, Public Health, Exercise, Obesity, Cardiovascular System, Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.15.1617</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: The Obese Without Cardiometabolic Risk Factor Clustering and the Normal Weight With Cardiometabolic Risk Factor Clustering: Prevalence and Correlates of 2 Phenotypes Among the US Population (NHANES 1999-2004)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>15</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1624</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1617</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1629?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels and the Risk of Mortality in the General Population]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1629?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> In patients undergoing dialysis, therapy with calcitriol or paricalcitol or other vitamin D agents is associated with reduced mortality. Observational data suggests that low 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (25[OH]D) are associated with diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and cancers. However, whether low serum 25(OH)D levels are associated with mortality in the general population is unknown.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> We tested the association of low 25(OH)D levels with all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality in 13&nbsp;331 nationally representative adults 20 years or older from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) linked mortality files. Participant vitamin D levels were collected from 1988 through 1994, and individuals were passively followed for mortality through 2000.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> In cross-sectional multivariate analyses, increasing age, female sex, nonwhite race/ethnicity, diabetes, current smoking, and higher body mass index were all independently associated with higher odds of 25(OH)D deficiency (lowest quartile of 25(OH)D level, &lt;17.8 ng/mL [to convert to nanomoles per liter, multiply by 2.496]), while greater physical activity, vitamin D supplementation, and nonwinter season were inversely associated. During a median 8.7 years of follow-up, there were 1806 deaths, including 777 from CVD. In multivariate models (adjusted for baseline demographics, season, and traditional and novel CVD risk factors), compared with the highest quartile, being in the lowest quartile (25[OH]D levels &lt;17.8 ng/mL) was associated with a 26% increased rate of all-cause mortality (mortality rate ratio, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.08-1.46) and a population attributable risk of 3.1%. The adjusted models of CVD and cancer mortality revealed a higher risk, which was not statistically significant.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> The lowest quartile of 25(OH)D level (&lt;17.8 ng/mL) is independently associated with all-cause mortality in the general population.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Melamed, M. L., Michos, E. D., Post, W., Astor, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders, Nutrition/ Malnutrition, Public Health, Public Health, Other, Renal Diseases, Dialysis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.15.1629</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels and the Risk of Mortality in the General Population]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>15</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1637</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1629</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1638?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Reduced Disability and Mortality Among Aging Runners: A 21-Year Longitudinal Study]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1638?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Exercise has been shown to improve many health outcomes and well-being of people of all ages. Long-term studies in older adults are needed to confirm disability and survival benefits of exercise.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> Annual self-administered questionnaires were sent to 538 members of a nationwide running club and 423 healthy controls from northern California who were 50 years and older beginning in 1984. Data included running and exercise frequency, body mass index, and disability assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI; scored from 0 [no difficulty] to 3 [unable to perform]) through 2005. A total of 284 runners and 156 controls completed the 21-year follow-up. Causes of death through 2003 were ascertained using the National Death Index. Multivariate regression techniques compared groups on disability and mortality.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> At baseline, runners were younger, leaner, and less likely to smoke compared with controls. The mean (SD) HAQ-DI score was higher for controls than for runners at all time points and increased with age in both groups, but to a lesser degree in runners (0.17 [0.34]) than in controls (0.36 [0.55]) (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). Multivariate analyses showed that runners had a significantly lower risk of an HAQ-DI score of 0.5 (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.84). At 19 years, 15% of runners had died compared with 34% of controls. After adjustment for covariates, runners demonstrated a survival benefit (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.82). Disability and survival curves continued to diverge between groups after the 21-year follow-up as participants approached their ninth decade of life.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> Vigorous exercise (running) at middle and older ages is associated with reduced disability in later life and a notable survival advantage.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chakravarty, E. F., Hubert, H. B., Lingala, V. B., Fries, J. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Public Health, Exercise, Rehabilitation Medicine, Sports Medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.15.1638</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Reduced Disability and Mortality Among Aging Runners: A 21-Year Longitudinal Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>15</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1646</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1638</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1647?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Long-term Clinical Outcomes Following Coronary Stenting]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1647?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Clinical trials of drug-eluting stents (DES) vs bare metal stents (BMS) report a reduced need for target lesion revascularization with no difference in death or myocardial infarction. However, these trials selectively enrolled patients with lower risk, single-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) and limited the follow-up period to 1 year or less. Thus, it is not known how these short-term results apply to patients with higher risk, multivessel CAD seen in community practice settings. The objective of this study was to compare the long-term clinical outcomes of patients receiving DES vs BMS in a clinical practice setting.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> Patients from the Duke Databank for Cardiovascular Disease undergoing their initial revascularization with DES or BMS from January 1, 2000, through July 31, 2005, were included in the study population. Propensity scores and inverse probability weighted estimators were used to adjust for treatment group imbalances.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The study population included 1501 patients who received DES and 3165 who received BMS. After adjustment, DES reduced target vessel revascularization (TVR) rates at 6, 12, and 24 months compared with BMS (24-month rates: DES, 6.6%; BMS, 16.3%; difference, &ndash;9.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], &ndash;11.7% to &ndash;7.7%; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). The TVR benefit for DES increased among patients with multivessel CAD (1-vessel CAD: &ndash;8.3%; 95% CI, &ndash;10.9% to &ndash;5.8%; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001; 2-vessel CAD: &ndash;9.7%; 95% CI, &ndash;3.6% to &ndash;5.8%; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001; 3-vessel CAD: &ndash;16.2%; 95% CI, &ndash;25.2% to &ndash;7.2%; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). However, in the overall cohort there were no statistically significant differences in the composite of death or myocardial infarction.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Patients receiving DES vs BMS in a clinical practice setting have lower TVR rates, albeit with less absolute benefit than those observed in clinical trials. Patients with multivessel vs single-vessel disease experience a greater reduction in TVR.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anstrom, K. J., Kong, D. F., Shaw, L. K., Califf, R. M., Kramer, J. M., Peterson, E. D., Rao, S. V., Matchar, D. B., Mark, D. B., Harrington, R. A., Eisenstein, E. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiovascular System, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction, Drug Therapy, Drug Therapy, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.15.1647</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Long-term Clinical Outcomes Following Coronary Stenting]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>15</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1655</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1647</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1657?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Prediction of Progression to Overt Hypothyroidism or Hyperthyroidism in Female Relatives of Patients With Autoimmune Thyroid Disease Using the Thyroid Events Amsterdam (THEA) Score]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1657?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Genetic and environmental factors are involved in the pathogenesis of autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD). Family members of patients with AITD are at increased risk for AITD, but not all will develop overt hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism. Our goal was to develop a simple predictive score that has broad applicability and is easily calculated at presentation for progression to overt hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism within 5 years in female relatives of patients with AITD.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of 790 healthy first- or second-degree female relatives of patients with documented Graves or Hashimoto disease in the Netherlands. Baseline assessment included measurement of serum thyrotropin (TSH), free thyroxine (FT<SUB>4</SUB>), and thyroid peroxidase (TPO) antibody levels as well as evaluation for the presence and levels of <I>Yersinia enterocolitica</I> antibodies. We also gathered data on family background, smoking habits, use of estrogen medication, pregnancy, and exposure to high levels of iodine. In follow-up, thyroid function was investigated annually for 5 years. As main outcome measures, termed <I>events</I>, we looked for overt hypothyroidism (TSH levels >5.7 mIU/L and FT<SUB>4</SUB> levels &lt;0.72 ng/dL) or overt hyperthyroidism (TSH levels &lt;0.4 mIU/L and FT<SUB>4</SUB> levels >1.56 ng/dL).</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The cumulative event rate was 7.5% over 5 years. The mean annual event rate was 1.5%. There were 38 hypothyroid and 13 hyperthyroid events. Independent risk factors for events were baseline findings for TSH and TPO antibodies in a level-dependent relationship (for TSH the risk already starts to increase at values >2.0 mIU/L) and family background (with the greatest risk attached to subjects having 2 relatives with Hashimoto disease). A numerical score, the Thyroid Events Amsterdam (THEA) score, was designed to predict events by weighting these 3 risk factors proportionately to their relative risks (maximum score, 21): low (0-7), medium (8-10), high (11-15), and very high (16-21). These THEA scores were associated with observed event rates of 2.7%, 14.6%, 27.1%, and 76.9%, respectively.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> An accurate simple predictive score was developed to estimate the 5-year risk of overt hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism in female relatives of patients with AITD. However, in view of the small number of observed events, independent validation of the THEA score is called for.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Strieder, T. G. A., Tijssen, J. G. P., Wenzel, B. E., Endert, E., Wiersinga, W. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Endocrine Disease of Head & Neck, Women's Health, Women's Health, Other, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Endocrine Diseases, Thyroid/ Parathyroid Diseases, Genetics, Genetic Disorders, Immunology, Immunologic Disorders]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.15.1657</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Prediction of Progression to Overt Hypothyroidism or Hyperthyroidism in Female Relatives of Patients With Autoimmune Thyroid Disease Using the Thyroid Events Amsterdam (THEA) Score]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>15</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1663</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1657</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1664?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Geographic Variation in Rheumatoid Arthritis Incidence Among Women in the United States]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1664?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> The geographic variation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) incidence in the United States is unknown.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> We studied residential region from January 1, 1921, to May 31, 1976, and RA risk in a prospective cohort of women, the Nurses' Health Study. Information on state of residence was collected at baseline in 1976 (when participants were aged 30-55 years) and on state of residence at birth, at age 15 years, and at age 30 years in 1992. Among 83&nbsp;546 participants reporting residence for all 4 time points, 706 incident RA cases from June 1, 1976, to May 31, 2004, were confirmed by screening questionnaire and record review for American College of Rheumatology criteria. Residential region was classified as West, Midwest, mid-Atlantic, New England, and Southeast. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess relationships between region and RA risk, adjusting for age, smoking, body mass index, parity, breastfeeding, postmenopausal status, postmenopausal hormone use, father's occupation, race, and physical activity. Analyses were performed in participants who lived in the same regions, or moved, over time.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Compared with those in the West, women in New England had a 37% to 45% elevated risk of RA in multivariate models at each time point (eg, state of residence in 1976: rate ratio [RR], 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-1.82). In analyses of women who lived in the same region at birth, age 15 years, and age 30 years, living in the Midwest was associated with greater risk (RR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.05-2.05), as was living in New England (RR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.98-2.00). Compared with living in the West at birth, age 15 years, and age 30 years, RA risk was higher in the East.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> In this large cohort of US women, significant geographic variation in incident RA existed after controlling for confounders. Potential explanations include regional variation in behavioral factors, climate, environmental exposures, RA diagnosis, and genetic factors.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Costenbader, K. H., Chang, S.-C., Laden, F., Puett, R., Karlson, E. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Public Health, Public Health, Other, Rheumatology, Women's Health, Women's Health, Other, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Immunology, Immunologic Disorders]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.15.1664</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Geographic Variation in Rheumatoid Arthritis Incidence Among Women in the United States]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>15</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1670</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1664</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1671?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: The Risk of Fracture Following Hospitalization in Older Women and Men]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1671?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Hospitalization may cause bone loss and decrease physical function; however, the risk of fracture following hospitalization is not known.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> A prospective study of a cohort of 3075 white and black women and men, aged 70 to 79 years, recruited from 2 communities from 1997 to 1998. Incident hospitalizations and fractures were validated by medical records by investigators blinded to patient groupings. Analyses of the association between hospitalization, length of stay, number of admissions, and risk of fracture were adjusted for age, race, sex, and other potential confounding factors.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> During follow-up with a mean duration of 6.6 years, 2030 (66%) of the 3075 participants were admitted to a hospital and 809 (26%) were admitted 3 or more times; 285 experienced a fracture, including 74 hip fractures. After adjusting for age, race, and sex, those who had any hospitalization had a 2-fold increased risk of fracture (hazard ratio [HR], 2.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.57-2.57), including an increased risk of hip fracture (HR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.32-3.50). Those who were hospitalized twice during the follow-up period had a 2.42-fold increased risk of hip fracture (95% CI, 1.16-5.05), and 3 or more hospital stays indicated a 3.66-fold increased relative hazard for hip fracture (95% CI, 1.78-7.53).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Hospitalizations, particularly multiple admissions, are very common in elderly individuals and are strongly associated with an increased risk of hip and other types of fracture. Hospitalizations present opportunities to take measures to reduce the risk of fractures.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gardner, R. L., Harris, F., Vittinghoff, E., Cummings, S. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Men's Health, Men's Health, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Orthopedic Surgery, Women's Health, Women's Health, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.15.1671</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: The Risk of Fracture Following Hospitalization in Older Women and Men]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>15</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1677</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1671</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1678?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Overweight, Obesity, and the Risk of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1678?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Excess body weight is a risk factor for a first venous thromboembolism. The impact of excess body weight on risk of recurrent venous thrombosis is uncertain.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> We studied 1107 patients for an average of 46 months after a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism and withdrawal of anticoagulant therapy. Excluded were pregnant patients, those requiring long-term antithrombotic treatment, and those who had a previous or secondary thrombosis, natural coagulation inhibitor deficiency, lupus anticoagulant, or cancer. Our study end point was symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> A total of 168 patients had recurrent venous thromboembolism. Mean (SD) body mass index (BMI) (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) was significantly higher among patients with recurrence than among those without recurrence: 28.5 (6.0) vs 26.9 (5.0) (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.01). The relationship between excess body weight and recurrence was linear; the adjusted hazard ratio for each 1-point increase in BMI was 1.044 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.013-1.076) (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). Four years after discontinuation of anticoagulant therapy, the probability of recurrence was 9.3% (95% CI, 6.0%-12.7%) among patients of normal weight and 16.7% (95% CI, 11.0%-22.3%) and 17.5% (95% CI, 13.0%-22.0%) among overweight and obese patients, respectively. Compared with patients of normal weight, the hazard ratio of recurrence adjusted for age, sex, factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A mutation, high factor VIII levels, and type of initial venous thromboembolic event was 1.3 (95% CI, 0.9-1.9) (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.20) among overweight patients and 1.6 (95% CI, 1.1-2.4) (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.02) among obese individuals. The population attributable risk corresponding to excess body weight was 26.8% (95% CI, 5.3%-48.2%).</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> Excess body weight is a risk factor of recurrent venous thromboembolism.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eichinger, S., Hron, G., Bialonczyk, C., Hirschl, M., Minar, E., Wagner, O., Heinze, G., Kyrle, P. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Venous Thromboembolism, Public Health, Obesity, Cardiovascular System]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.15.1678</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Overweight, Obesity, and the Risk of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>15</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1683</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1678</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1684?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Cost-effectiveness of Proton Pump Inhibitor Cotherapy in Patients Taking Long-term, Low-Dose Aspirin for Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1684?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) require long-term therapy with low-dose aspirin (ASA). Although these patients are at increased risk for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) cotherapy may reduce such risk, it is not known whether lifelong PPI cotherapy is cost-effective.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> A Markov model was developed to compare lifelong therapy with ASA alone vs therapy with ASA plus PPI in patients with CHD who are at least 50 years old. Base-case assumptions were (1) starting age, 65 years (range, 50-80 years); (2) UGIB risk category, average risk (range, average to 8-fold increased risk); (3) PPI effectiveness (66% (range, 25%-75%); and (4) annual PPI cost, $250 (range, $250-$1400).</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> In the base-case analysis, ASA plus PPI resulted in fewer lifetime UGIB events (3.1% vs 9.5%) and UGIB-related deaths (0.4% vs 1.4%). At over-the-counter (OTC) PPI cost, ASA plus PPI was cost-effective, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $40&nbsp;090 per life-year saved (LYS). Varying PPI effectiveness from 75% to 25% resulted in ICERs of $35&nbsp;315 to $94&nbsp;578 per LYS. Varying the starting age of the cohort from 80 to 50 years resulted in ICERs of $16&nbsp;887 to $79&nbsp;955 per LYS. At prescription PPI cost, the ICER for average-risk patients was over $100&nbsp;000 per LYS across all modeled age groups and assumptions of PPI effectiveness, but the ICER for high-risk patients was $10&nbsp;433 to $51&nbsp;505 per LYS.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> At OTC cost, PPI cotherapy is cost-effective in average-risk patients taking low-dose ASA for secondary prevention. At prescription cost, cotherapy is cost-effective for high-risk patients only.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saini, S. D., Schoenfeld, P., Fendrick, A. M., Scheiman, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Cardiovascular System, Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction, Drug Therapy, Drug Therapy, Other, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.15.1684</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Cost-effectiveness of Proton Pump Inhibitor Cotherapy in Patients Taking Long-term, Low-Dose Aspirin for Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>15</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1690</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1684</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1691?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[INVITED COMMENTARY: Cost-effectiveness of Proton Pump Inhibitor Cotherapy in Patients Taking Long-term, Low-Dose Aspirin for Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention--Invited Commentary]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1691?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pignone, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Cardiovascular System, Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction, Drug Therapy, Drug Therapy, Other, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.15.1691</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[INVITED COMMENTARY: Cost-effectiveness of Proton Pump Inhibitor Cotherapy in Patients Taking Long-term, Low-Dose Aspirin for Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention--Invited Commentary]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>15</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1691</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1691</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Commentary</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1692?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Medical Records and Quality of Care in Acute Coronary Syndromes: Results From CRUSADE]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1692?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Patient medical records are important means of communication among health care providers. Limited evaluation has been performed of the quality of the medical records or its association with health care processes or outcomes.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> We performed an empirical evaluation of the completeness of medical records from 607 randomly selected patients admitted with non&ndash;ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACS) to 219 US hospitals in the CRUSADE National Quality Improvement Initiative. Composite medical records scores were summated and compared by hospital academic status and physician specialty. Correlations between medical records scores, use of evidence-based medicine (EBM), and in-hospital mortality were assessed.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Medical records were frequently missing key elements, including cardiac history (23.6%), performance status (64.6%), differential diagnosis (57.8%), and planned use of EBM (44.0%). Evidence-based medicine was more often discussed in medical records from academic medical centers vs nonacademic medical centers (69.7% vs 51.7%) (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001) and from cardiologists vs noncardiologists (60.5% vs 48.1%, <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.003). Higher medical records quality scores were associated with greater use of EBM among the medical records quality cohort (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.006), and a similar trend was observed in CRUSADE overall: adjusted odds ratio, 1.26 (95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.72) for high vs low medical records quality. Higher medical records quality scores were associated with lower in-hospital mortality: adjusted odds ratio, 0.79 (95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.97).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Medical records for patients with NSTE ACS often lack key elements of the history and physical examination. Patients treated at hospitals with better medical records quality have significantly lower mortality and may receive more EBM. The relationship between better medical charting and better medical care could lead to new ways to monitor and improve the quality of medical care.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dunlay, S. M., Alexander, K. P., Melloni, C., Kraschnewski, J. L., Liang, L., Gibler, W. B., Roe, M. T., Ohman, E. M., Peterson, E. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Informatics/ Internet in Medicine, Informatics, Other, Physical Examination, Cardiovascular System, Quality of Care, Evidence-Based Medicine, Quality of Care, Other, Diagnosis, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.15.1692</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Medical Records and Quality of Care in Acute Coronary Syndromes: Results From CRUSADE]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>15</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1698</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1692</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1699?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: The Hemoglobin A1c Level as a Progressive Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Death, Hospitalization for Heart Failure, or Death in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Analysis of the Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity (CHARM) Program]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1699?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> A progressive relationship between hemoglobin A<SUB>1c</SUB> (HbA<SUB>1c</SUB>) levels and cardiovascular (CV) events has been observed in persons with and without diabetes. To our knowledge, the nature of such a relationship in patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure (HF) has not been studied.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> A total of 2412 participants (907 with prior diabetes) in the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity (CHARM) program with at least 1 HbA<SUB>1c</SUB> level were followed up for a median of 34 months. The incidence of the primary outcome (CV death or HF hospitalization), CV death, and total mortality was calculated according to eighths of the usual HbA<SUB>1c</SUB> level ranging from 5.8% or less to greater than 8.6%. Adjusted and unadjusted hazard ratios per 1% rise in HbA<SUB>1c</SUB> levels were also calculated.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> A total of 99.6% of eligible participants were followed up until they developed an outcome or the study finished. The risk of the primary composite outcome, CV death, hospitalization for worsening HF, and total mortality rose progressively with higher levels of usual HbA<SUB>1c</SUB> (<I>P</I> for trend &lt;.001). After age and sex were adjusted for, hazards of these outcomes per 1% higher HbA<SUB>1c</SUB> level were 1.25 (95% confidence interval [CI ],1.20-1.31), 1.24 (95% CI, 1.17-1.31), 1.25 (95% CI, 1.19-1.31), and 1.22 (95% CI, 1.16-1.29), respectively. This relationship was evident in patients with and without diabetes and with reduced or preserved ejection fraction and persisted after adjustment for diabetes, other risk factors, and allocation to candesartan.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> In diabetic and nondiabetic patients with symptomatic chronic HF, the HbA<SUB>1c</SUB> level is an independent progressive risk factor for CV death, hospitalization for HF, and total mortality.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gerstein, H. C., Swedberg, K., Carlsson, J., McMurray, J. J. V., Michelson, E. L., Olofsson, B., Pfeffer, M. A., Yusuf, S., for the CHARM Program Investigators]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiovascular System, Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction, Endocrine Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Congestive Heart Failure/ Cardiomyopathy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.15.1699</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: The Hemoglobin A1c Level as a Progressive Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Death, Hospitalization for Heart Failure, or Death in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Analysis of the Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity (CHARM) Program]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>15</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1704</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1699</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1705?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Practical Barriers to Timely Primary Care Access: Impact on Adult Use of Emergency Department Services]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1705?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Most Americans report having a usual source of medical care, but many also report significant barriers to timely access to such care. This can lead patients to use the emergency department (ED) as a ready alternative to their usual source of medical care, even when such care could be provided more cost-effectively in a primary care setting. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between ED visits and perceived barriers to receiving timely primary care.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> Among 30&nbsp;677 adults 18 years or older participating in the adult sample section of the National Health Interview Survey, 23&nbsp;413 who reported having a usual source of medical care other than the ED and answered the questions related to barriers were included in our analyses. Associations between perceived timely access barriers and reported use of ED in the previous 12 months were examined using logistic regression to control for covariates that also affect ED use.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> For those reporting no access barriers, 1 in 5 adult Americans in the noninstitutionalized civilian population visited an ED at least once during the preceding year. For those reporting 1 or more barriers, the proportion having an ED visit was 1 in 3. Four of the 5 following timely access barriers was independently associated with ED use, even after adjusting for other socioeconomic and health-related factors: (1) "couldn't get through on phone" (OR [odds ratio], 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.59); (2) "couldn't get appointment soon enough" (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.21-1.75); (3) "waiting too long in doctor's office" (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.02-1.41); (4) "not open when you could go" (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.99-1.55); and (5) "no transportation" (OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.50-2.35).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> The benefits of having a usual source of medical care are diminished by barriers that limit effective and timely access to such care. Interventions to improve effective access to medical care such as open access scheduling might have benefits not only for individual patients and practices but also for health policy related to cost-effective health care delivery systems and our need to relieve overcrowded conditions at EDs.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rust, G., Ye, J., Baltrus, P., Daniels, E., Adesunloye, B., Fryer, G. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Medical Practice, Medical Practice, Other, Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care, Patient-Physician Communication, Primary Care/ Family Medicine, Emergency Medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.15.1705</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Practical Barriers to Timely Primary Care Access: Impact on Adult Use of Emergency Department Services]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>15</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1710</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1705</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1710?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CORRECTION: Incomplete Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest in: Computed Tomographic Colonography to Screen for Colorectal Cancer, Extracolonic Cancer, and Aortic Aneurysm: Model Simulation With Cost-effectiveness Analysis]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1710?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Venous Thromboembolism, Oncology, Colon Cancer, Oncology, Other, Cardiovascular System, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.15.1710</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CORRECTION: Incomplete Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest in: Computed Tomographic Colonography to Screen for Colorectal Cancer, Extracolonic Cancer, and Aortic Aneurysm: Model Simulation With Cost-effectiveness Analysis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>15</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1710</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1710</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correction</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1712?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[COMMENTS, OPINIONS, AND BRIEF CASE REPORTS: Satisfaction With Career Choice Among US Medical Students]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1712?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank, E., Carrera, J. S., Rao, J. K., Anderson, L. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Medical Practice, Medical Education]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.15.1712</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[COMMENTS, OPINIONS, AND BRIEF CASE REPORTS: Satisfaction With Career Choice Among US Medical Students]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>15</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1716</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1712</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Comments, Opinions, and Brief Case Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1717?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[EDITOR'S CORRESPONDENCE: Delirium and Costs of Informal Home Care]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1717?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bellelli, G., Bianchetti, A., Trabucchi, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Medical Practice, Medical Practice, Other, Neurology, Neurology, Other, Psychiatry, Delirium]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.15.1717-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[EDITOR'S CORRESPONDENCE: Delirium and Costs of Informal Home Care]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>15</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1717</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1717</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editor's Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1717-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[EDITOR'S CORRESPONDENCE: State Human Immunodeficiency Virus Testing Laws]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1717-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neff, S., Goldschmidt, R. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[HIV/AIDS, Medical Practice, Law and Medicine, Public Health, Public Health, Other, Diagnosis, Infectious Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.15.1717-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[EDITOR'S CORRESPONDENCE: State Human Immunodeficiency Virus Testing Laws]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>15</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1718</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1717</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editor's Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1718?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[EDITOR'S CORRESPONDENCE: Rheumatoid Arthritis Interstitial Lung Disease: Mycophenolate Mofetil as an Antifibrotic and Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1718?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saketkoo, L. A., Espinoza, L. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pulmonary Diseases, Pulmonary Diseases, Other, Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Drug Therapy, Drug Therapy, Other, Immunology, Immunologic Disorders]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.15.1718</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[EDITOR'S CORRESPONDENCE: Rheumatoid Arthritis Interstitial Lung Disease: Mycophenolate Mofetil as an Antifibrotic and Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>15</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1719</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1718</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editor's Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1719?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[EDITOR'S CORRESPONDENCE: Informing Patients of Their Coronary Risk]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1719?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gandjour, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care, Patient-Physician Communication, Patient Education/ Health Literacy, Cardiovascular System, Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.15.1719-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[EDITOR'S CORRESPONDENCE: Informing Patients of Their Coronary Risk]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>15</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1719</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1719</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editor's Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1719-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[EDITOR'S CORRESPONDENCE: Periodontal Surgery for Patients Receiving Anticoagulant Therapy]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1719-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elad, S., Findler, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Thrombolysis, Venous Thromboembolism, Dentistry/ Oral Medicine, Cardiovascular System, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Interventions, Other, Cardiovascular Intervention]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.15.1719-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[EDITOR'S CORRESPONDENCE: Periodontal Surgery for Patients Receiving Anticoagulant Therapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>15</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1719</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1719</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editor's Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1719-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[EDITOR'S CORRESPONDENCE: The Hurdles of Translating a Single-Center Observation Into Practice]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1719-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Testa, L., Bhindi, R., Banning, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiovascular System, Statistics and Research Methods, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction, Endocrine Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Cardiac Diagnostic Tests]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.15.1719-c</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[EDITOR'S CORRESPONDENCE: The Hurdles of Translating a Single-Center Observation Into Practice]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>15</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1720</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1719</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editor's Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1720?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[EDITOR'S CORRESPONDENCE: The Hurdles of Translating a Single-Center Observation Into Practice--Reply]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/15/1720?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peterson, P. N., Masoudi, F. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-11</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiovascular System, Statistics and Research Methods, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction, Endocrine Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Cardiac Diagnostic Tests]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.15.1720</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[EDITOR'S CORRESPONDENCE: The Hurdles of Translating a Single-Center Observation Into Practice--Reply]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>15</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1720</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1720</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editor's Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1482?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ABOUT THIS JOURNAL: About This Journal]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1482?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ABOUT THIS JOURNAL: About This Journal]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>14</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1482</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1482</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>About This Journal</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1484?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[IN THIS ISSUE OF ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE: In This Issue of Archives of Internal Medicine]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1484?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.14.1484</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[IN THIS ISSUE OF ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE: In This Issue of Archives of Internal Medicine]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>14</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1484</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1484</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>In This Issue of Archives of Internal Medicine</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1485?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[EDITORIAL: Are You What You Eat, or How Much You Eat?: The Case of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1485?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Feinglos, M. N., Totten, S. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders, Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders, Other, Public Health, Obesity, Women's Health, Women's Health, Other, Diet, Endocrine Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.14.1485</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[EDITORIAL: Are You What You Eat, or How Much You Eat?: The Case of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>14</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1486</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1485</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1487?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in African American Women]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1487?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Type 2 diabetes mellitus is an increasingly serious health problem among African American women. Consumption of sugar-sweetened drinks was associated with an increased risk of diabetes in 2 studies but not in a third; however, to our knowledge, no data are available on African Americans regarding this issue. Our objective was to examine the association between consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages, weight gain, and incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in African American women.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> A prospective follow-up study of 59&nbsp;000 African American women has been in progress since 1995. Participants reported on food and beverage consumption in 1995 and 2001. Biennial follow-up questionnaires ascertained new diagnoses of type 2 diabetes. The present analyses included 43&nbsp;960 women who gave complete dietary and weight information and were free from diabetes at baseline. We identified 2713 incident cases of type 2 diabetes mellitus during 338&nbsp;884 person-years of follow-up. The main outcome measure was the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus was higher with higher intake of both sugar-sweetened soft drinks and fruit drinks. After adjustment for confounding variables including other dietary factors, the incidence rate ratio for 2 or more soft drinks per day was 1.24 (95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.45). For fruit drinks, the comparable incidence rate ratio was 1.31 (95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.52). The association of diabetes with soft drink consumption was almost entirely mediated by body mass index, whereas the association with fruit drink consumption was independent of body mass index.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Regular consumption of sugar-sweetened soft drinks and fruit drinks is associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in African American women. While there has been increasing public awareness of the adverse health effects of soft drinks, little attention has been given to fruit drinks, which are often marketed as a healthier alternative to soft drinks.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Palmer, J. R., Boggs, D. A., Krishnan, S., Hu, F. B., Singer, M., Rosenberg, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Public Health, Obesity, Women's Health, Women's Health, Other, Diet, Endocrine Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.14.1487</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in African American Women]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>14</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1492</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1487</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1493?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Plasma Vitamin C Level, Fruit and Vegetable Consumption, and the Risk of New-Onset Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The European Prospective Investigation of Cancer-Norfolk Prospective Study]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1493?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Epidemiologic studies suggest that greater consumption of fruit and vegetables may decrease the risk of diabetes mellitus, but the evidence is limited and inconclusive. Plasma vitamin C level is a good biomarker of fruit and vegetable intake, but, to our knowledge, no prospective studies have examined its association with diabetes risk. This study aims to examine whether fruit and vegetable intake and plasma vitamin C level are associated with the risk of incident type 2 diabetes.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> We administered a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire to men and women from a population-based prospective cohort (European Prospective Investigation of Cancer&ndash;Norfolk) study who were aged 40 to 75 years at baseline (1993-1997) when plasma vitamin C level was determined and habitual intake of fruit and vegetables was assessed. During 12 years of follow-up between February 1993 and the end of December 2005, 735 clinically incident cases of diabetes were identified among 21&nbsp;831 healthy individuals. We report the odds ratios of diabetes associated with sex-specific quintiles of fruit and vegetable intake and of plasma vitamin C levels.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> A strong inverse association was found between plasma vitamin C level and diabetes risk. The odds ratio of diabetes in the top quintile of plasma vitamin C was 0.38 (95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.52) in a model adjusted for demographic, lifestyle, and anthropometric variables. In a similarly adjusted model, the odds ratio of diabetes in the top quintile of fruit and vegetable consumption was 0.78 (95% confidence interval, 0.60-1.00).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Higher plasma vitamin C level and, to a lesser degree, fruit and vegetable intake were associated with a substantially decreased risk of diabetes. Our findings highlight a potentially important public health message on the benefits of a diet rich in fruit and vegetables for the prevention of diabetes.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harding, A.-H., Wareham, N. J., Bingham, S. A., Khaw, K., Luben, R., Welch, A., Forouhi, N. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Diet, Endocrine Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.14.1493</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Plasma Vitamin C Level, Fruit and Vegetable Consumption, and the Risk of New-Onset Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The European Prospective Investigation of Cancer-Norfolk Prospective Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>14</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1499</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1493</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1500?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Low-Fat Dietary Pattern and Risk of Treated Diabetes Mellitus in Postmenopausal Women: The Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Dietary Modification Trial]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1500?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Decreased fat intake with weight loss and increased exercise may reduce the risk of diabetes mellitus in persons with impaired glucose tolerance. This study was undertaken to assess the effects of a low-fat dietary pattern on incidence of treated diabetes among generally healthy postmenopausal women.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> A randomized controlled trial was conducted at 40 US clinical centers from 1993 to 2005, including 48&nbsp;835 postmenopausal women aged 50 to 79 years. Women were randomly assigned to a usual-diet comparison group (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;29&nbsp;294 [60.0%]) or an intervention group with a 20% low-fat dietary pattern with increased vegetables, fruits, and grains (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;19&nbsp;541 [40.0%]). Self-reported incident diabetes treated with oral agents or insulin was assessed.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Incident treated diabetes was reported by 1303 intervention participants (7.1%) and 2039 comparison participants (7.4%) (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-1.03; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.25). Weight loss occurred in the intervention group, with a difference between intervention and comparison groups of 1.9 kg after 7.5 years (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). Subgroup analysis suggested that greater decreases in percentage of energy from total fat reduced diabetes risk (<I>P</I> for trend&nbsp;=&nbsp;.04), which was not statistically significant after adjusting for weight loss.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> A low-fat dietary pattern among generally healthy postmenopausal women showed no evidence of reducing diabetes risk after 8.1 years. Trends toward reduced incidence were greater with greater decreases in total fat intake and weight loss. Weight loss, rather than macronutrient composition, may be the dominant predictor of reduced risk of diabetes.</p>
<p><b>Trial Registration&nbsp;</b> clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: <inter-ref locator-type="url" locator="http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00000611">NCT00000611</inter-ref></p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tinker, L. F., Bonds, D. E., Margolis, K. L., Manson, J. E., Howard, B. V., Larson, J., Perri, M. G., Beresford, S. A. A., Robinson, J. G., Rodriguez, B., Safford, M. M., Wenger, N. K., Stevens, V. J., Parker, L. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Public Health, Obesity, Women's Health, Women's Health, Other, Randomized Controlled Trial, Diet, Endocrine Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.14.1500</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Low-Fat Dietary Pattern and Risk of Treated Diabetes Mellitus in Postmenopausal Women: The Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Dietary Modification Trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>14</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1511</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1500</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1514?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Thyroid Function and the Risk of Alzheimer Disease: The Framingham Study]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1514?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Clinical hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism are recognized causes of reversible dementia, but previous studies relating thyrotropin levels to cognitive performance in clinically euthyroid persons have yielded inconsistent results.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> We related serum thyrotropin concentrations measured at baseline (March 1977-November 1979) to the risk of Alzheimer disease (AD) in 1864 cognitively intact, clinically euthyroid Framingham original cohort participants (mean age, 71 years; 59% women). Sex-specific Cox proportional hazards models were constructed using tertiles of thyrotropin concentration (tertile 2 as the referent) and adjusting for age, apolipoprotein E 4 allele status, educational level, plasma homocysteine level, current smoking, body mass index, prevalent stroke, and atrial fibrillation.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> During a mean follow-up of 12.7 years (range, 1-25 years), 209 participants (142 women) developed AD. Women in the lowest (&lt;1.0 mIU/L) and highest (>2.1 mIU/L) tertiles of serum thyrotropin concentration were at increased risk for AD (multivariate-adjusted hazard ratio, 2.39 [95% confidence interval, 1.47-3.87] [<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001] and 2.15 [95% confidence interval, 1.31-3.52] [<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.003], respectively) compared with those in the middle tertile. Thyrotropin levels were not related to AD risk in men. Analyses excluding individuals receiving thyroid supplementation did not significantly alter these relationships. In analyses limited to participants with serum thyrotropin levels of 0.1 to 10.0 mIU/L, the U-shaped relationship between thyrotropin level and AD risk was maintained in women but not when analyses were limited to those with thyrotropin levels of 0.5 to 5.0 mIU/L.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> Low and high thyrotropin levels were associated with an increased risk of incident AD in women but not in men.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tan, Z. S., Beiser, A., Vasan, R. S., Au, R., Auerbach, S., Kiel, D. P., Wolf, P. A., Seshadri, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Men's Health, Men's Health, Other, Neurology, Alzheimer Disease, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Endocrine Disease of Head & Neck, Women's Health, Women's Health, Other, Endocrine Diseases, Thyroid/ Parathyroid Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.14.1514</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Thyroid Function and the Risk of Alzheimer Disease: The Framingham Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>14</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1520</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1514</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1522?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Prevalence of Hearing Loss and Differences by Demographic Characteristics Among US Adults: Data From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2004]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1522?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Hearing loss affects health and quality of life. The prevalence of hearing loss may be growing because of an aging population and increasing noise exposure. However, accurate national estimates of hearing loss prevalence based on recent objective criteria are lacking.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> We determined hearing loss prevalence among US adults and evaluated differences by demographic characteristics and known risk factors for hearing loss (smoking, noise exposure, and cardiovascular risks). A national cross-sectional survey with audiometric testing was performed. Participants were 5742 US adults aged 20 to 69 years who participated in the audiometric component of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2004. The main outcome measure was 25-dB or higher hearing loss at speech frequencies (0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz) and at high frequencies (3, 4, and 6 kHz).</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> In 2003-2004, 16.1% of US adults (29 million Americans) had speech-frequency hearing loss. In the youngest age group (20-29 years), 8.5% exhibited hearing loss, and the prevalence seems to be growing among this age group. Odds of hearing loss were 5.5-fold higher in men vs women and 70% lower in black subjects vs white subjects. Increases in hearing loss prevalence occurred earlier among participants with smoking, noise exposure, and cardiovascular risks.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Hearing loss is more prevalent among US adults than previously reported. The prevalence of US hearing loss differs across racial/ethnic groups, and our data demonstrate associations with risk factors identified in prior smaller-cohort studies. Our findings also suggest that hearing loss prevention (through modifiable risk factor reduction) and screening should begin in young adulthood.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Agrawal, Y., Platz, E. A., Niparko, J. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Men's Health, Men's Health, Other, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Hearing Loss/ Deafness, Public Health, Tobacco, Cardiovascular System, Public Health, Other, Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.14.1522</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Prevalence of Hearing Loss and Differences by Demographic Characteristics Among US Adults: Data From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2004]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>14</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1530</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1522</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1531?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Efficacy and Safety of Colesevelam in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Inadequate Glycemic Control Receiving Insulin-Based Therapy]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1531?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Poor glycemic control is a risk factor for microvascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Achieving glycemic control safely with insulin therapy can be challenging.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> A prospective, 16-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study conducted at 50 sites in the United States and 1 site in Mexico between August 12, 2004, and December 28, 2005. Subjects had type 2 diabetes mellitus that was not adequately controlled (glycated hemoglobin level, 7.5%-9.5%, inclusive) receiving insulin therapy alone or in combination with oral antidiabetes agents. In total 287 subjects (52% men; mean age, 57 years; with a mean baseline glycated hemoglobin level of 8.3%) were randomized: 147 to receive colesevelam hydrochloride, 3.75 g/d, and 140 to receive placebo.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Using the least squares method, the mean (SE) change in glycated hemoglobin level from baseline to week 16 was &ndash;0.41% (0.07%) for the colesevelam-treated group and 0.09% (0.07%) for the placebo group (treatment difference, &ndash;0.50% [0.09%]; 95% confidence interval, &ndash;0.68% to &ndash;0.32%; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). Consistent reductions in fasting plasma glucose and fructosamine levels, glycemic-control response rate, and lipid control measures were observed with colesevelam. As expected, the colesevelam-treated group had a 12.8% reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration relative to placebo (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). Of recipients of colesevelam and placebo, respectively, 30 and 26 discontinued the study prematurely; 7 and 9 withdrew because of protocol-specified hyperglycemia, and 10 and 4 withdrew because of adverse events. Both treatments were generally well tolerated.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Colesevelam treatment seems to be safe and effective for improving glycemic control and lipid management in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving insulin-based therapy, and it may provide a novel treatment for improving dual cardiovascular risk factors.</p>
<p><b>Trial Registration&nbsp;</b> clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: <inter-ref locator-type="url" locator="http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00151749">NCT00151749</inter-ref></p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Goldberg, R. B., Fonseca, V. A., Truitt, K. E., Jones, M. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders, Lipids and Lipid Disorders, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Drug Therapy, Drug Therapy, Other, Endocrine Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.14.1531</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Efficacy and Safety of Colesevelam in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Inadequate Glycemic Control Receiving Insulin-Based Therapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>14</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1540</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1531</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1541?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Positron Emission Tomography and Improved Survival in Patients With Lung Cancer: The Will Rogers Phenomenon Revisited]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1541?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> The Will Rogers phenomenon occurs when newer technology allows for more sensitive detection of tumor spread, resulting in stage migration and an apparent improvement in patient survival. We investigated whether use of highly sensitive positron emission tomography (PET) scanning in non&ndash;small cell lung cancer has had this effect.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> We performed a retrospective analysis involving 12&nbsp;395 patients with non&ndash;small cell lung cancer in the pre-PET (1994-1998) and PET (1999-2004) periods. Interperiod differences in staging procedures, clinical variables, and patient survival were evaluated.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> There was a 5.4% decline in the number of patients with stage III disease and an 8.4% increase in the number of patients with stage IV disease in the PET period, corresponding with an increase in PET use from 6.3% to 20.1% (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). The PET period predicted better survival with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-0.99) (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.02). Use of PET was independently associated with better survival in patients with stage III (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.69-0.85) and stage IV (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.58-0.70) disease, but not those with stage I or II disease.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> These data support the notion that stage migration is responsible at least in part for an apparent improvement in survival for patients with stage III and IV non&ndash;small cell lung cancer in the PET scan era.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chee, K. G., Nguyen, D. V., Brown, M., Gandara, D. R., Wun, T., Lara, P. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Lung Cancer, Pulmonary Diseases, Pulmonary Diseases, Other, Statistics and Research Methods, Diagnosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.14.1541</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Positron Emission Tomography and Improved Survival in Patients With Lung Cancer: The Will Rogers Phenomenon Revisited]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>14</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1549</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1541</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1550?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Effect of Exercise on 24-Month Weight Loss Maintenance in Overweight Women]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1550?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Debate remains regarding the amount of physical activity that will facilitate weight loss maintenance.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> Between December 1, 1999, and January 31, 2003, 201 overweight and obese women (body mass index [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared], 27 to 40; age range, 21-45 years) with no contraindications to weight loss or physical activity were recruited from a hospital-based weight loss research center. Participants were assigned to 1 of 4 behavioral weight loss intervention groups. They were randomly assigned to groups based on physical activity energy expenditure (1000 vs 2000 kcal/wk) and intensity (moderate vs vigorous). Participants also were told to reduce intake to 1200 to 1500 kcal/d. A combination of in-person conversations and telephone calls were conducted during the 24-month study period.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Weight loss did not differ among the randomized groups at 6 months' (8%-10% of initial body weight) or 24 months' (5% of initial body weight) follow-up. Post-hoc analysis showed that individuals sustaining a loss of 10% or more of initial body weight at 24 months reported performing more physical activity (1835 kcal/wk or 275 min/wk) compared with those sustaining a weight loss of less than 10% of initial body weight (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> The addition of 275 mins/wk of physical activity, in combination with a reduction in energy intake, is important in allowing overweight women to sustain a weight loss of more than 10%. Interventions to facilitate this level of physical activity are needed.</p>
<p><b>Trial Registration&nbsp;</b> clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: <inter-ref locator-type="url" locator="http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00006315">NCT00006315</inter-ref>.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jakicic, J. M., Marcus, B. H., Lang, W., Janney, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Public Health, Exercise, Obesity, Women's Health, Women's Health, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.14.1550</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Effect of Exercise on 24-Month Weight Loss Maintenance in Overweight Women]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>14</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1559</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1550</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1559?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[INVITED COMMENTARY: Effect of Exercise on 24-Month Weight Loss Maintenance in Overweight Women--Invited Commentary]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1559?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thompson, W. G., Levine, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Public Health, Exercise, Obesity, Women's Health, Women's Health, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.14.1559</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[INVITED COMMENTARY: Effect of Exercise on 24-Month Weight Loss Maintenance in Overweight Women--Invited Commentary]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>14</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1560</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1559</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Commentary</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1561?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: A Steep Increase in Domestic Fatal Medication Errors With Use of Alcohol and/or Street Drugs]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1561?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Increasingly, medications are consumed outside of clinical settings, with relatively little professional oversight. Despite this trend, previous studies of medication errors have focused on clinical settings.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> We examined all US death certificates from January 1, 1983, to December 31, 2004 (N&nbsp;=&nbsp;49&nbsp;586&nbsp;156), particularly those with fatal medication errors (FMEs) (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;224&nbsp;355). We examined trends in 4 types of FMEs that vary according to the relative importance of alcohol/street drugs and the relative likelihood of professional oversight in the consumption of medications.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The overall FME death rate increased by 360.5% (1983-2004). This increase far exceeds the increase in death rates from adverse effects of medications (33.2%) or from alcohol and/or street drugs (40.9%). The increase in FMEs varies markedly by type. Type 1 (domestic FMEs combined with alcohol and/or street drugs) shows the largest increase (3196%). In contrast, type 4 (nondomestic FMEs not involving alcohol and/or street drugs) shows the smallest increase (5%). Types 2 and 3 show intermediate increases. Type 2 (domestic FMEs not involving alcohol and/or street drugs) increased by 564%. Type 3 (nondomestic FMEs combined with alcohol and/or street drugs) increased by 555%. Thus, domestic FMEs combined with alcohol and/or street drugs have become an increasingly important health problem compared with other FMEs.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> These findings suggest that a shift in the location of medication consumption from clinical to domestic settings is linked to a steep increase in FMEs. It may now be possible to reduce FMEs by focusing not only on clinical settings but also on domestic settings.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phillips, D. P., Barker, G. E. C., Eguchi, M. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Public Health, Substance Abuse/ Alcoholism, Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Drug Therapy, Adverse Effects, Medication Error]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.14.1561</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: A Steep Increase in Domestic Fatal Medication Errors With Use of Alcohol and/or Street Drugs]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>14</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1566</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1561</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1568?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Menopause and the Metabolic Syndrome: The Study of Women's Health Across the Nation]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1568?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Cross-sectional studies suggest that prevalence of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) increases from premenopause to postmenopause in women, independent of age. Little is known about why. We hypothesized that the incidence of the MetS increases with progression through menopause and that this increase is explained by the progressive androgenicity of the hormonal milieu.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> This longitudinal, 9-year study of 949 participants in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation investigates the natural history of the menopausal transition. Participants of 5 ethnicities at 7 geographic sites were recruited when they were premenopausal or early perimenopausal and were eligible for this study if they (1) reached menopause during the study; (2) had never taken hormone therapy, and (3) did not have diabetes mellitus or the MetS at baseline. The primary outcome was the presence of MetS using National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria. Secondary outcomes were the components of the MetS.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> By the final menstrual period, 13.7% of the women had new-onset MetS. Longitudinal analyses, centered at the final menstrual period, were adjusted for age at menopause, ethnicity, study site, marital status, education, body mass index, smoking, and aging. Odds of developing the MetS per year in perimenopause were 1.45 (95% confidence interval, 1.35-1.56); after menopause, 1.24 (95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.30). These odds were significantly different (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). An increase in bioavailable testosterone or a decrease in sex hormone&ndash;binding globulin levels increased the odds.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> As testosterone progressively dominates the hormonal milieu during the menopausal transition, the prevalence of MetS increases, independent of aging and other important covariates. This may be a pathway by which cardiovascular disease increases during menopause.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janssen, I., Powell, L. H., Crawford, S., Lasley, B., Sutton-Tyrrell, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders, Metabolic Diseases, Public Health, Cardiovascular System, Public Health, Other, Women's Health, Menopause, Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.14.1568</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Menopause and the Metabolic Syndrome: The Study of Women's Health Across the Nation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>14</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1575</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1568</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1576?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Prevalence of Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis and the Appropriateness of Joint Replacement in an Older Population]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1576?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Relatively little is known about the prevalence of knee and hip osteoarthritis in the general population.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> To estimate the prevalence of knee and hip osteoarthritis and the appropriateness of joint replacement in a general population of older individuals, the validated Knee and Hip OsteoArthritis Screening Questionnaire (KHOA-SQ) was sent to a random sample of individuals aged 60 to 90 years, stratified by age and sex, living in a single province in Spain. Respondents positive for knee or hip osteoarthritis on the KHOA-SQ were invited to be examined by an orthopedic surgeon. Diagnosis of knee or hip osteoarthritis was based on clinical and radiographic data. For respondents judged as having osteoarthritis, the appropriateness of knee or hip replacement was evaluated using published explicit criteria.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Of 11&nbsp;002 individuals contacted, 7577 completed the KHOA-SQ. The derived prevalence of hip osteoarthritis was approximately 7.4%. It was slightly higher in women (8.0%) than in men (6.7%) and tended to increase with age. The estimated appropriateness rate for hip replacement was 37.7% in men and 52.7% in women with osteoarthritis. The derived prevalence of knee osteoarthritis was 12.2%; it was significantly higher in women (14.9%) than in men (8.7%) and tended to increase with age. The estimated appropriateness rate for knee replacement was 11.8% in men and 17.9% in women with osteoarthritis.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Knee and hip osteoarthritis are highly prevalent diseases in the older population. The estimation of appropriateness for hip replacement seems to be significantly higher than that for knee replacement.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quintana, J. M., Arostegui, I., Escobar, A., Azkarate, J., Goenaga, J. I., Lafuente, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Rheumatology, Osteoarthritis, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Orthopedic Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.14.1576</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Prevalence of Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis and the Appropriateness of Joint Replacement in an Older Population]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>14</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1584</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1576</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1585?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: National Trends in Ambulatory Visits and Antibiotic Prescribing for Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1585?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Community-acquired methicillin-resistant <I>Staphylococcus aureus</I> (CA-MRSA) has emerged as a common cause of skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs) in the United States. It is unknown whether this development has affected the national rate of visits to primary care practices and emergency departments (EDs) and whether changes in antibiotic prescribing have occurred.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> We examined visits by patients with SSTIs to physician offices, hospital outpatient departments, and EDs using the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 1997 to 2005. We estimated annual visit rates for all SSTIs and a subset classified as abscess/cellulitis. For abscess/cellulitis visits, we examined trends in characteristics of patients and clinical settings and in antibiotic prescribing.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Overall rate of visits for SSTIs increased from 32.1 to 48.1 visits per 1000 population (50%; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.003 for trend), reaching 14.2 million by 2005. More than 95% of this change was attributable to visits for abscess/cellulitis, which increased from 17.3 to 32.5 visits per 1000 population (88% increase; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001 for trend). The largest relative increases occurred in EDs (especially in high safety-net&ndash;status EDs and in the South), among black patients, and among patients younger than 18 years. Use of antibiotics recommended for CA-MRSA increased from 7% to 28% of visits (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001) during the study period. Independent predictors of treatment with these antibiotics included being younger than 45 years, living in the South, and an ED setting.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> The incidence of SSTIs has rapidly increased nationwide in the CA-MRSA era and appears to disproportionately affect certain populations. Although physicians are beginning to modify antibiotic prescribing practices, opportunities for improvement exist, targeting physicians caring for patients who are at high risk.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hersh, A. L., Chambers, H. F., Maselli, J. H., Gonzales, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Infectious Diseases, Other, Dermatology, Dermatologic Disorders, Dermatologic Disorders, Other, Drug Therapy, Drug Therapy, Other, Infectious Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.14.1585</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: National Trends in Ambulatory Visits and Antibiotic Prescribing for Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>14</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1591</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1585</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1592?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[EDITOR'S CORRESPONDENCE: QTc Interval Prolongation and Opioid Addiction Therapy]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/14/1592?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baker, W. A., Krantz, M. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Public Health, Substance Abuse/ Alcoholism, Cardiovascular System, Arrhythmias, Drug Therapy, Adverse Effects]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.14.1592</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[EDITOR'S CORRESPONDENCE: QTc Interval Prolongation and Opioid Addiction Therapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>14</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1592</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1592</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editor's Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1362?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ABOUT THIS JOURNAL: About This Journal]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1362?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-14</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ABOUT THIS JOURNAL: About This Journal]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>13</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1362</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1362</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>About This Journal</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1364?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[IN THIS ISSUE OF ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE: In This Issue of Archives of Internal Medicine]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1364?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-14</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.13.1364</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[IN THIS ISSUE OF ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE: In This Issue of Archives of Internal Medicine]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>13</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1364</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1364</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>In This Issue of Archives of Internal Medicine</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1365?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[EDITORIAL: What Do Certification Examinations Tell Us About Quality?]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1365?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Landon, B. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-14</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Medical Practice, Medical Education, Quality of Care, Quality of Care, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.13.1365</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[EDITORIAL: What Do Certification Examinations Tell Us About Quality?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>13</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1367</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1365</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1368?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[EDITORIAL: Shared Decision Making: Have We Missed the Obvious?]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1368?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hanson, J. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-14</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care, Patient-Physician Communication, Primary Care/ Family Medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.13.1368</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[EDITORIAL: Shared Decision Making: Have We Missed the Obvious?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>13</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1370</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1368</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1371?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[REVIEW ARTICLE: Statistical Models and Patient Predictors of Readmission for Heart Failure: A Systematic Review]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1371?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Readmission after heart failure (HF) hospitalization is an increasing focus for physicians and policy makers, but statistical models are needed to assess patient risk and to compare hospital performance. We performed a systematic review to describe models designed to compare hospital rates of readmission or to predict patients' risk of readmission, as well as to identify studies evaluating patient characteristics associated with hospital readmission, all among patients admitted for HF.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> We identified relevant studies published between January 1, 1950, and November 19, 2007, by searching MEDLINE, Scopus, PsycINFO, and all 4 Ovid Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews. Eligible English-language publications reported on readmission after HF hospitalization among adult patients. We excluded experimental studies and publications without original data or quantitative outcomes.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> From 941 potentially relevant articles, 117 met inclusion criteria: none contained models to compare readmission rates among hospitals, 5 (4.3%) presented models to predict patients' risk of readmission, and 112 (95.7%) examined patient characteristics associated with readmission. Studies varied in case identification, used multiple types of data sources, found few patient characteristics consistently associated with readmission, and examined differing outcomes, often either readmission alone or a combined outcome of readmission or death, measured across varying periods (from 14 days to 4 years). Two articles reported model discriminations of patient readmission risk, both of which were modest (C statistic, 0.60 for both).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Our systematic review identified no model designed to compare hospital rates of readmission, while models designed to predict patients' readmission risk used heterogeneous approaches and found substantial inconsistencies regarding which patient characteristics were predictive. Clinically, patient risk stratification is challenging. From a policy perspective, a validated risk-standardized statistical model to accurately profile hospitals using readmission rates is unavailable in the published English-language literature to date.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross, J. S., Mulvey, G. K., Stauffer, B., Patlolla, V., Bernheim, S. M., Keenan, P. S., Krumholz, H. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-14</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiovascular System, Statistics and Research Methods, Review, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Congestive Heart Failure/ Cardiomyopathy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.13.1371</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[REVIEW ARTICLE: Statistical Models and Patient Predictors of Readmission for Heart Failure: A Systematic Review]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>13</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1386</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1371</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1387?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[REVIEW ARTICLE: Relationship, Communication, and Efficiency in the Medical Encounter: Creating a Clinical Model From a Literature Review]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1387?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> While there is consensus about the value of communication skills, many physicians complain that there is not enough time to use these skills. Little is known about how to combine effective relationship development and communication skills with time management to maximize efficiency. Our objective was to examine what physician-patient relationship and communication skills enhance efficiency.</p>
<p><b>Data Sources&nbsp;</b> We conducted searches of PubMed, EMBASE, and PsychINFO for the date range January 1973 to October 2006. We reviewed the reference lists of identified publications and the bibliographies of experts in physician-patient communication for additional publications.</p>
<p><b>Study Selection&nbsp;</b> From our initial group of citations (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;1146), we included only studies written in English that reported original data on the use of communication or relationship skills and their effect on time use or visit length. Study inclusion was determined by independent review by 2 authors (L.B.M. and D.C.D.). This yielded 9 publications for our analysis.</p>
<p><b>Data Extraction&nbsp;</b> The 2 reviewers independently read and classified the 9 publications and cataloged them by type of study, results, and limitations. Differences were resolved by consensus.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Three domains emerged that may enhance communication efficiency: rapport building, up-front agenda setting, and acknowledging social or emotional clues.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Building on these findings, we offer a model blending the quality-enhancing and time management features of selected communication and relationship skills. There is a need for additional research about communication skills that enhance quality and efficiency.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mauksch, L. B., Dugdale, D. C., Dodson, S., Epstein, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-14</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care, Patient-Physician Communication, Primary Care/ Family Medicine, Review]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.13.1387</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[REVIEW ARTICLE: Relationship, Communication, and Efficiency in the Medical Encounter: Creating a Clinical Model From a Literature Review]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>13</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1395</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1387</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1396?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Association Between Maintenance of Certification Examination Scores and Quality of Care for Medicare Beneficiaries]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1396?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> The relationship between physicians' cognitive skill and the delivery of evidence-based processes of care is not well characterized.Therefore, we set out to determine associations between general internists' performance on the American Board of Internal Medicine maintenance of certification examination and the receipt of important processes of care by Medicare patients.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> Physicians were grouped into quartiles based on their performance on the American Board of Internal Medicine examination. Hierarchical generalized linear models examined associations between examination scores and the receipt of processes of care by Medicare patients. The main outcome measures were the associations between diabetes care, using a composite measure of hemoglobin A<SUB>1c</SUB>, and lipid testing and retinal screening, mammography, and lipid testing in patients with cardiovascular disease and the physician's performance on the American Board of Internal Medicine examination, adjusted for the number of Medicare patients with diabetes and cardiovascular disease in a physician's practice panel; frequency of visits; patient comorbidity, age, and ethnicity; and physician training history and type of practice.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Physicians scoring in the top quartile were more likely to perform processes of care for diabetes (composite measure odds ratio [OR], 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.27) and mammography screening (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.08-1.21) than physicians in the lowest physician quartile, even after adjustment for multiple factors. There was no significant difference among the groups in lipid testing of patients with cardiovascular disease (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.91-1.10).</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> Our findings suggest that physician cognitive skills, as measured by a maintenance of certification examination, are associated with higher rates of processes of care for Medicare patients.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Holmboe, E. S., Wang, Y., Meehan, T. P., Tate, J. P., Ho, S.-Y., Starkey, K. S., Lipner, R. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-14</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Medical Practice, Medical Education, Primary Care/ Family Medicine, Quality of Care, Quality of Care, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.13.1396</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Association Between Maintenance of Certification Examination Scores and Quality of Care for Medicare Beneficiaries]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>13</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1403</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1396</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1404?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Physicians' Shared Decision-Making Behaviors in Depression Care]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1404?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Although shared decision making (SDM) has been reported to facilitate quality care, few studies have explored the extent to which SDM is implemented in primary care and factors that influence its application. This study assesses the extent to which physicians enact SDM behaviors and describes factors associated with physicians' SDM behaviors within the context of depression care.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> In a secondary analysis of data from a randomized experiment, we coded 287 audiorecorded interactions between physicians and standardized patients (SPs) using the Observing Patient Involvement (OPTION) system to assess physician SDM behaviors. We performed a series of generalized linear mixed model analyses to examine physician and patient characteristics associated with SDM behavior.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The mean (SD) OPTION score was 11.4 (3.3) of 48 possible points. Older physicians (partial correlation coefficient&nbsp;=&nbsp;&ndash;0.29; &beta;&nbsp;=&nbsp;&ndash;0.09; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.01) and physicians who practiced in a health maintenance organization setting (&beta;&nbsp;=&nbsp;&ndash;1.60; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.01) performed fewer SDM behaviors. Longer visit duration was associated with more SDM behaviors (partial correlation coefficient&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.31; &beta;&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.08; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.01). In addition, physicians enacted more SDM behaviors with SPs who made general (&beta;&nbsp;=&nbsp;2.46; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.01) and brand-specific (&beta;&nbsp;=&nbsp;2.21; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.01) medication requests compared with those who made no request.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> In the context of new visits for depressive symptoms, primary care physicians performed few SDM behaviors. However, physician SDM behaviors are influenced by practice setting and patient-initiated requests for medication. Additional research is needed to identify interventions that encourage SDM when indicated.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Young, H. N., Bell, R. A., Epstein, R. M., Feldman, M. D., Kravitz, R. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-14</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care, Patient-Physician Communication, Primary Care/ Family Medicine, Psychiatry, Depression]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archinte.168.13.1404</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Physicians' Shared Decision-Making Behaviors in Depression Care]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>13</prism:number>
<prism:volume>168</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1408</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1404</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Investigation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1409?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION: Hidden in Plain Sight: Medical Visit Companions as a Resource for Vulnerable Older Adults]]></title>
<link>http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/168/13/1409?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Sicker patients are less satisfied with the quality of health care they receive than their healthier counterparts.</p>
<p><b>Methods&nbsp;</b> A sample of 12&nbsp;018 community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older from the 2004 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey was studied. Multivariate regression was used to describe whether beneficiaries' self-reported satisfaction with their usual-care physician was related to the presence or functions assumed by visit companions.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Overall, 38.6% of beneficiaries reported being typically accompanied to routine medical visits. Accompanied beneficiaries were older, less educated, and in worse health than their unaccompanied counterparts. More than 60% of companions facilitated visit communication by recording physician instructions (44.1%), providing information regarding patients' medical conditions or needs (41.6%), asking questions (41.1%), or explaining physicians' instructions (29.7%). After controlling for sociodemographic and health differences, accompanied beneficiaries were more highly satisfied with their physician's technical skills (odds ratio [OR],&nbsp;1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.30), information giving (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.05-1.35), and interpersonal skills (OR,&nbsp;1.18; 95% CI, 1.03-1.35) than unaccompanied beneficiaries. Accompanied beneficiaries whose visit companions were more actively engaged in communication rate